LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-66279: QTS, QuTS hero

A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later QuTS hero h6.0.0.3397 build 20260206 and later

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a high-severity flaw in QNAP NAS operating systems. An attacker who already has an administrator account could use it to run arbitrary commands on the device. That makes compromised admin credentials much more dangerous, because the NAS may store sensitive business data and backups.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority infrastructure update for QNAP NAS systems, especially where devices store backups, sensitive files, or business-critical data. The privilege requirement lowers immediate internet-wide risk, but any admin account compromise could become full device command execution.

Technical view

CVE-2025-66279 is a CWE-78 command injection issue affecting QNAP QTS and QuTS hero versions. The CVSS 4.0 score is 8.6 with network attack vector, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, and high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on QNAP NAS appliances running affected QTS 5.2.x or QuTS hero h5.2.x, h5.3.x, or h6.0.x builds below the vendor-fixed versions. The issue requires administrator privileges, so risk rises sharply where admin accounts are shared, weakly protected, or externally reachable.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Exploitation requires a remote attacker to gain an administrator account first, then abuse the command injection flaw to execute arbitrary commands. No exploit details are provided in the source bundle.

Researcher notes

The strongest evidence is the QNAP advisory and CVE record. The affected version data is broad, and the bundle does not include model-level scope, proof-of-concept status, or telemetry. Avoid assuming exploitation in the wild without KEV or another cited source.

Mitigation direction

  • Update QTS to 5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 or later.
  • Update QuTS hero h5.2 to h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 or later.
  • Update QuTS hero h5.3 to h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 or later.
  • Update QuTS hero h6.0 to h6.0.0.3397 build 20260206 or later.
  • Check QNAP advisory QSA-26-10 for model-specific update guidance.
  • Review and protect administrator accounts on affected NAS devices.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory QNAP NAS devices and record QTS or QuTS hero version and build.
  • Compare installed builds against QNAP’s fixed version list.
  • Identify NAS management interfaces reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review administrator account inventory for unexpected, shared, or stale accounts.
  • Check QNAP QSA-26-10 for any updated vendor guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-66279 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nqnap

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-66279Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
QNAP Systems Inc.QTS5.2.0unaffected
QNAP Systems Inc.QuTS heroh5.2.0, h5.3.0, ?unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.