LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-65888: A dimension validation flaw in the flow.empty() component of OneFlow 0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Deni...

A dimension validation flaw in the flow.empty() component of OneFlow 0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a negative or excessively large dimension value.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-65888 is a denial-of-service flaw in OneFlow 0.9.0. If an attacker can influence dimensions passed to flow.empty(), negative or extremely large values may crash or exhaust resources. The impact is availability, not data theft or modification, based on the provided CVSS vector.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for services using OneFlow 0.9.0 with attacker-controlled dimensions. It is less urgent for isolated research environments without untrusted input paths.

Technical view

The CVE describes improper dimension validation in OneFlow's flow.empty() component. It is mapped to CWE-400 and scored CVSS 3.1 7.5 with network, low-complexity, unauthenticated, no-user-interaction conditions and high availability impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where OneFlow 0.9.0 is deployed and untrusted or loosely validated input can reach tensor-shape or dimension parameters. The CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete, listing vendor/product as n/a, so confirm actual dependency versions locally.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The described attack condition is resource exhaustion through invalid dimensions, but the bundle does not provide public evidence of exploitation in the wild.

Researcher notes

The record is sparse: affected CPEs are absent and no patch is named in the provided bundle. Analysis should anchor on OneFlow 0.9.0, flow.empty(), CWE-400, and the GitHub issue until vendor details are clearer.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory systems and applications using OneFlow, especially version 0.9.0.
  • Check OneFlow vendor guidance and issue 10664 for fixed versions or workarounds.
  • Validate and bound all user-controlled tensor dimensions before calling flow.empty().
  • Limit service resource usage to reduce blast radius from allocation failures.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or multi-tenant ML services first.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed OneFlow versions in runtime images, notebooks, and dependency lockfiles.
  • Review code paths where external input influences tensor dimensions.
  • Check monitoring for crashes, memory exhaustion, or repeated allocation failures.
  • Verify input validation rejects negative and excessive dimensions before OneFlow calls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-400: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-65888 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-65888Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.