CVE-2025-65784: Insecure permissions in Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3 allows authenticated attackers...
Insecure permissions in Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to access other users' information via a crafted API request.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A logged-in low-privileged user may be able to view information belonging to other users in Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3. The business risk is unauthorized disclosure of user data through the application API, not system takeover.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation if the product stores personal, tenant, financial, or customer-sensitive information. The flaw requires authentication, lowering broad internet risk, but confidentiality impact is high for affected deployments.
Technical view
The CVE describes insecure permissions reachable over the network with low privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality impact. CVSS is 6.5. The record lists CWE-918, but the description reads like an authorization or object-access control issue; treat that mismatch as source ambiguity.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to deployments of Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3. The CVE affected-product fields are n/a and no CPEs are provided, so asset matching may require internal software inventory and vendor confirmation.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. It states an authenticated attacker with low-level privileges can use a crafted API request to access other users' information. No public exploit status beyond the linked research reference is established here.
Researcher notes
The record was published on 2026-01-13 and updated on 2026-07-05. Evidence is sparse: affected vendor/product metadata is n/a, and the CWE assignment appears inconsistent with the narrative. Validate against the GitHub research reference and vendor materials before broad classification.
Mitigation direction
Check vendor or maintainer guidance for a fixed release or official workaround.
Limit API access to trusted authenticated users until authorization is verified.
Review and enforce per-user authorization on affected API endpoints.
Monitor application logs for unusual cross-user data access patterns.
Reduce stored or exposed sensitive user data where feasible.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether Hub v2.0 1.27.3 is present in production or staging.
Review API authorization checks for user-specific records and identifiers.
Use an authorized low-privilege test account to verify cross-user data isolation.
Check logs for low-privilege accounts accessing unrelated user records.
Document uncertainty caused by missing CPE and affected-product metadata.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-918 · source CWE mapping
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.