LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-65784: Insecure permissions in Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3 allows authenticated attackers...

Insecure permissions in Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to access other users' information via a crafted API request.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A logged-in low-privileged user may be able to view information belonging to other users in Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3. The business risk is unauthorized disclosure of user data through the application API, not system takeover.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation if the product stores personal, tenant, financial, or customer-sensitive information. The flaw requires authentication, lowering broad internet risk, but confidentiality impact is high for affected deployments.

Technical view

The CVE describes insecure permissions reachable over the network with low privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality impact. CVSS is 6.5. The record lists CWE-918, but the description reads like an authorization or object-access control issue; treat that mismatch as source ambiguity.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to deployments of Hubert Imoveis e Administracao Ltda Hub v2.0 1.27.3. The CVE affected-product fields are n/a and no CPEs are provided, so asset matching may require internal software inventory and vendor confirmation.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. It states an authenticated attacker with low-level privileges can use a crafted API request to access other users' information. No public exploit status beyond the linked research reference is established here.

Researcher notes

The record was published on 2026-01-13 and updated on 2026-07-05. Evidence is sparse: affected vendor/product metadata is n/a, and the CWE assignment appears inconsistent with the narrative. Validate against the GitHub research reference and vendor materials before broad classification.

Mitigation direction

  • Check vendor or maintainer guidance for a fixed release or official workaround.
  • Limit API access to trusted authenticated users until authorization is verified.
  • Review and enforce per-user authorization on affected API endpoints.
  • Monitor application logs for unusual cross-user data access patterns.
  • Reduce stored or exposed sensitive user data where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Hub v2.0 1.27.3 is present in production or staging.
  • Review API authorization checks for user-specific records and identifiers.
  • Use an authorized low-privilege test account to verify cross-user data isolation.
  • Check logs for low-privilege accounts accessing unrelated user records.
  • Document uncertainty caused by missing CPE and affected-product metadata.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-65784 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N2.83.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-65784Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.