LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-65568: A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the omec-project UPF (pfcpiface component) in version upf-epc-p...

A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the omec-project UPF (pfcpiface component) in version upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. After PFCP association, a PFCP Session Establishment Request that includes a CreateFAR with an empty or truncated IPv4 address field is not properly validated. During parsing, parseFAR() calls ip2int(), which performs an out-of-bounds read on the IPv4 address buffer and triggers an index-out-of-range panic. An attacker who can send PFCP Session Establishment Request messages to the UPF's N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this issue to repeatedly crash the UPF and disrupt user-plane services.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw can crash an OMEC UPF component that carries mobile user-plane traffic. A network attacker with access to the PFCP/N4 endpoint could repeatedly interrupt service. The bundle does not show data theft, integrity impact, active exploitation, or a confirmed fix.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability risk for mobile core environments using the affected OMEC UPF component. Focus on exposure reduction and vendor guidance, especially where PFCP is reachable beyond trusted peers.

Technical view

CVE-2025-65568 affects omec-project UPF pfcpiface in upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. After PFCP association, improper validation of an empty or truncated IPv4 field in CreateFAR leads parseFAR() to call ip2int(), causing an out-of-bounds read and index-out-of-range panic.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to deployments running the named OMEC UPF pfcpiface build with reachable N4/PFCP service. Public internet exposure would materially increase risk, but the sources do not identify affected CPEs or additional versions.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. Exploitation requires the ability to send PFCP Session Establishment Request traffic to the UPF N4/PFCP endpoint.

Researcher notes

The bundle supports CWE-125 and CVSS 7.5 availability-only impact. Affected metadata is incomplete: vendor, product, CPEs, and fixed versions are not enumerated beyond the descriptive reference to OMEC UPF pfcpiface 2.1.3-dev.

Mitigation direction

  • Check OMEC UPF guidance and issue 962 for fixed versions or vendor-recommended changes.
  • Restrict PFCP/N4 access to trusted control-plane peers only.
  • Block untrusted network paths to the UPF PFCP endpoint.
  • Add monitoring and restart controls for repeated pfcpiface panics.
  • Prioritize upgrade or isolation for upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev deployments.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory OMEC UPF deployments and confirm pfcpiface image or package versions.
  • Verify whether upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev is present in production or labs.
  • Confirm PFCP/N4 listeners are not reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review UPF logs for parseFAR(), ip2int(), or index-out-of-range panic events.
  • Check firewall and segmentation rules around control-plane to user-plane traffic.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-125: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-65568 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-65568Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-125 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Read

Out-of-bounds Read represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.