LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-65341: Ecommerce Fruits Bazar 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in admin/edit_product.php.

Ecommerce Fruits Bazar 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in admin/edit_product.php.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Ecommerce Fruits Bazar 1.0 reportedly allows attacker-controlled script content through admin/edit_product.php. A victim must interact with the malicious content, potentially exposing limited browser data or enabling limited actions within the application. The available record does not establish broader system compromise.

Executive priority

Prioritize prompt investigation rather than emergency response. Internet-facing or business-critical deployments deserve accelerated containment and testing because successful XSS may affect user trust and application integrity. Lower priority is reasonable only after confirming the product or vulnerable page is absent or inaccessible.

Technical view

CVE-2025-65341 is classified as CWE-79 cross-site scripting with CVSS 3.1 score 6.1. The vector indicates network access, low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact. The XSS subtype and affected input are not established in the supplied summary.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Ecommerce Fruits Bazar 1.0 and admin/edit_product.php are deployed, particularly on internet-accessible systems. Actual exposure cannot be determined from the sources because no CPEs, deployment details, or confirmed affected configurations are provided.

Exploitation context

The supplied bundle does not identify active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires victim interaction but no attacker privileges. Public technical research is referenced, so defenders should treat the issue as disclosed while avoiding assumptions about real-world exploitation.

Researcher notes

The record provides a concise description, CVSS vector, CWE classification, and one research reference. It does not specify the vulnerable parameter, XSS subtype, affected configurations beyond version 1.0, patch availability, or exploitation telemetry. Product identity is stated in the title and description despite structured affected fields being listed as n/a.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify deployments of Ecommerce Fruits Bazar 1.0 and restrict unnecessary access to the affected page.
  • Check the project maintainer or repository for validated remediation guidance and an updated release.
  • Until guidance is available, limit the application to trusted users and networks where operationally feasible.
  • Review application logs and browser-facing telemetry for suspicious input or script execution indicators.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the deployed product version and whether admin/edit_product.php is present and reachable.
  • Determine whether the page accepts untrusted input that is later rendered in a browser.
  • Use a safe, non-destructive XSS assessment to verify output handling in an authorized test environment.
  • After remediation, repeat testing and confirm legitimate product-editing workflows still function.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-65341 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-65341Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.