LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-6395: Gnutls: null pointer dereference in _gnutls_figure_common_ciphersuite()

A NULL pointer dereference flaw was found in the GnuTLS software in _gnutls_figure_common_ciphersuite().

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-6395 is a GnuTLS crash-class flaw caused by a NULL pointer dereference during cipher suite negotiation. For affected systems, the main business risk is service disruption, not data theft. Red Hat lists multiple RHEL, OpenShift, Ceph, Discovery, and Insights proxy products as affected.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate operational resilience issue. It deserves timely patch management, especially for exposed TLS services, but the supplied evidence does not support emergency active-exploitation handling.

Technical view

The flaw is in _gnutls_figure_common_ciphersuite() in GnuTLS and is classified as CWE-476. CVSS 3.1 is 6.5 with network access, no privileges, no user interaction, high attack complexity, low integrity impact, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems or containers using affected Red Hat gnutls/libgnutls packages in RHEL 8, 9, 10, OpenShift 4, Ceph Storage 7, Discovery 2, or Insights proxy. RHEL 6 and 7 status is listed as unknown in the supplied data.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates remote reachability without authentication or user interaction, but high attack complexity. Available evidence supports a potential denial-of-service or crash scenario, with limited integrity impact and no stated confidentiality impact.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for Red Hat-tracked affected products and package names. The bundle names the vulnerable function and CWE but does not provide root-cause detail, exploit proof, or universal upstream fixed versions. Avoid expanding affected scope beyond cited products without vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply relevant Red Hat security advisories for affected products after vendor review.
  • Prioritize internet-facing TLS services using GnuTLS-backed components.
  • Check vendor guidance for products with unknown or downstream package status.
  • Update affected containers or base images that include vulnerable gnutls packages.
  • Monitor Red Hat, GnuTLS, Debian, and Siemens advisories for revised guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed gnutls/libgnutls package versions across Linux hosts and containers.
  • Map findings to affected Red Hat product entries and RHSA advisories.
  • Confirm OpenShift nodes and images inherit updated RHCOS or package content.
  • Review service logs for abnormal TLS negotiation crashes or restarts.
  • Track RHEL 6 and 7 separately because status is listed as unknown.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
12

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-476: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Container behavior lookup

The affected technology mentions containers, so container-specific ATT&CK technique review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-6395 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
3ADP providers
15Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H2.24.2redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-6395Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container
siemens-SADPADP container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibgnutlslibgnutls, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10gnutls, 0:3.8.9-9.el10_0.14affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnutls, 0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8gnutls, 0:3.6.16-8.el8_10.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gnutls, 0:3.8.3-6.el9_6.2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9gnutls, 0:3.8.3-6.el9_6.2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Update Services for SAP Solutionsgnutls, 0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Supportgnutls, 0:3.8.3-4.el9_4.4affected
Red HatRed Hat Ceph Storage 7rhceph/rhceph-7-rhel9, 7affected
Red HatRed Hat Discovery 2discovery/discovery-ui-rhel9, 2.3.0-1760554384affected
Red HatRed Hat Insights proxy 1.5insights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9, 1.5.7-1759331989affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6gnutlsunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7gnutlsunknown
Red HatRed Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4rhcosaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-476 · source CWE mapping

NULL Pointer Dereference

NULL Pointer Dereference represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.