LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-62341: HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF)

HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when an internal server is compromised possibly allowing an attacker to send unauthorized requests in certain scenarios leading to information disclosure or security bypass.

LowCVSS 3.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in HCL Connections may let an attacker abuse a compromised internal server to make unauthorized requests. Successful abuse could expose limited information or bypass some security controls. Exploitation has significant prerequisites, and the supplied assessment rates it low severity.

Executive priority

Treat this as a scheduled remediation with prompt exposure verification, not an emergency response based solely on current evidence. Escalate priority if Connections is broadly reachable, an internal server is suspected compromised, or HCL identifies affected builds without an available compensating control.

Technical view

CVE-2025-62341 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability, classified as CWE-918, affecting HCL Connections 7.0 and 8.0. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 3.7. The vector indicates network reachability, high attack complexity, low privileges, required user interaction, limited confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running HCL Connections 7.0 or 8.0 in the relevant vulnerable configuration. The source says an internal server must be compromised and exploitation works only in certain scenarios. Exact vulnerable builds, configurations, and fixed versions are not provided in the supplied evidence.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed in the supplied CISA KEV data, and no source provided here reports active exploitation or a public exploit. Successful abuse reportedly requires a compromised internal server, low privileges, user interaction, and high attack complexity.

Researcher notes

The description unusually ties SSRF to compromise of an internal server, but the precise request path, trust boundary, and vulnerable component are not supplied. The CVSS vector includes required user interaction and low privileges. Researchers should rely on HCL's advisory for build-level scope and remediation details; the evidence does not support stronger exploitability claims.

Mitigation direction

  • Consult HCL advisory KB0128493 for affected builds, patches, and vendor-approved mitigations.
  • Apply the vendor-provided update or mitigation after testing it in a representative environment.
  • Restrict unnecessary outbound access from Connections servers to internal services and sensitive metadata endpoints.
  • Investigate and contain any compromised internal server that could provide the stated attack prerequisite.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory HCL Connections deployments and record their versions, builds, and network placement.
  • Compare each deployment against the exact affected and remediated builds in HCL advisory KB0128493.
  • Review Connections and egress logs for unexpected server-originated requests to internal or sensitive destinations.
  • Confirm network controls prevent Connections servers from reaching unnecessary internal services.
  • Verify the vendor update or mitigation is present after remediation.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-62341 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.7CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N1.22.5HCL

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.7Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-62341Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HCLSoftwareConnections7.0, 8.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.