CVE-2025-62314: HCL AION is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities.
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where certain endpoints lack sufficient anti-automation controls. Automated or scripted requests may be submitted without adequate rate limiting or challenge mechanisms, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact under certain conditions.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
HCL AION v2.1.0 has endpoints that may accept too many automated requests without sufficient rate limiting or challenge controls. Under specific conditions, this could disrupt availability and cause limited unauthorized disclosure or modification. The supplied evidence rates the issue medium severity, not an emergency-level vulnerability.
Executive priority
Treat this as a moderate, time-bounded remediation item. Promptly identify AION v2.1.0 deployments and consult HCL guidance, with faster action for exposed or business-critical systems. Escalate if monitoring shows automation abuse or if HCL publishes broader affected-version or exploitation information.
Technical view
CVE-2025-62314 is a CWE-307 anti-automation weakness affecting HCL AION v2.1.0. Its CVSS 3.1 score is 5.6, with adjacent-network access, high attack complexity, low privileges, and user interaction required. Potential impact is low confidentiality and integrity loss but high availability impact. The vulnerable endpoints and triggering conditions are not identified.
Likely exposure
Exposure is supported only for HCL AION v2.1.0. Prioritize instances reachable by adjacent or otherwise permitted users, particularly where automated request controls are weak. The bundle marks other versions unaffected by default, but provides no deployment-specific evidence, endpoint list, or configuration criteria.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources do not report active exploitation, and this CVE is not listed as KEV in the bundle. Exploitation is constrained by adjacent-network access, low privileges, user interaction, and high complexity according to the CVSS vector. No exploit method or observed attack campaign is documented.
Researcher notes
The public bundle lacks endpoint names, request thresholds, root-cause detail, confirmed fixes, and proof-of-concept information. The description emphasizes automated requests, while the CVSS vector requires user interaction and adjacent-network access; the supplied evidence does not explain that relationship. Validation should remain non-disruptive because availability impact is rated high.
Mitigation direction
Inventory HCL AION deployments and identify any running v2.1.0.
Check the cited HCL advisory for current remediation or upgrade guidance.
Restrict access to AION endpoints according to business need and existing security policy.
Review existing gateway rate limits and anti-automation protections without treating them as a vendor fix.
Monitor relevant request traffic for unusual automated volume or repeated failures.
Validation and detection
Confirm deployed HCL AION versions using authoritative asset and change records.
Verify whether v2.1.0 endpoints are reachable from adjacent or permitted network segments.
Review endpoint and gateway logs for repeated or scripted request patterns.
Confirm documented rate-limiting or challenge controls cover exposed AION endpoints.
Recheck HCL guidance for affected-version clarification and remediation confirmation.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-307: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.