LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-61624: An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') [CWE-22] vulnerability in...

An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7.0, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 may allow an authenticated attacker with admin profile and at least read-write permissions to write or delete arbitrary files via specific CLI commands.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue lets a highly privileged authenticated administrator write or delete files outside intended directories on affected Fortinet products. It is not described as remotely exploitable by an unauthenticated attacker, but it can still damage critical security infrastructure if admin credentials are abused.

Executive priority

Treat this as a controlled but meaningful infrastructure risk. It is not an emergency based on the supplied evidence, but affected security appliances should be reviewed promptly because privileged misuse could disrupt availability or alter files.

Technical view

CVE-2025-61624 is a CWE-22 path traversal flaw affecting listed FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4 with local attack vector, high privileges required, no user interaction, and high integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments running the affected Fortinet versions where an attacker already has an admin profile with at least read-write permissions and CLI access. Downstream impact from the Siemens advisory should be validated from that vendor source.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. CVSS marks exploit code maturity as proof-of-concept, but the provided evidence does not include exploit details, observed attacks, or weaponization indicators.

Researcher notes

The key constraint is privilege: admin profile plus read-write permissions are required. The bundle does not provide affected command names, patch versions, or detection indicators, so validation should focus on version exposure, privileged access paths, and vendor advisory follow-up.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions against the affected ranges.
  • Review Fortinet FG-IR-26-122 for vendor-supported upgrade or workaround guidance.
  • Review Siemens SSA-975644 where Siemens-managed or Siemens-integrated deployments may be relevant.
  • Restrict administrative CLI access to named, trusted administrators using least privilege.
  • Monitor for unexpected file write or delete activity by privileged administrators.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm exact product family and version for each Fortinet appliance or virtual instance.
  • Identify administrator accounts with read-write permissions and CLI access.
  • Review privileged admin activity logs for unusual file operations or configuration changes.
  • Check vendor advisories for fixed versions before scheduling remediation.
  • Document Siemens advisory applicability if Siemens products or managed environments are present.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup

File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-61624 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C0.85.2fortinet

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-61624Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortiOS7.6.0, 7.4.0, 7.2.0, 7.0.0, 6.4.0unaffected
FortinetFortiProxy7.6.0, 7.4.0, 7.2.0, 7.0.0unaffected
FortinetFortiSwitchManager7.2.0, 7.0.0unaffected
FortinetFortiPAM1.7.0, 1.6.0, 1.5.0, 1.4.0, 1.3.0, 1.2.0, 1.1.0, 1.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-22 · source CWE mapping

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.