CVE-2025-61624: An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') [CWE-22] vulnerability in...
An Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') [CWE-22] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.9, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7.0, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiProxy 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions, FortiProxy 7.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.7, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 may allow an authenticated attacker with admin profile and at least read-write permissions to write or delete arbitrary files via specific CLI commands.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This issue lets a highly privileged authenticated administrator write or delete files outside intended directories on affected Fortinet products. It is not described as remotely exploitable by an unauthenticated attacker, but it can still damage critical security infrastructure if admin credentials are abused.
Executive priority
Treat this as a controlled but meaningful infrastructure risk. It is not an emergency based on the supplied evidence, but affected security appliances should be reviewed promptly because privileged misuse could disrupt availability or alter files.
Technical view
CVE-2025-61624 is a CWE-22 path traversal flaw affecting listed FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4 with local attack vector, high privileges required, no user interaction, and high integrity and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to environments running the affected Fortinet versions where an attacker already has an admin profile with at least read-write permissions and CLI access. Downstream impact from the Siemens advisory should be validated from that vendor source.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. CVSS marks exploit code maturity as proof-of-concept, but the provided evidence does not include exploit details, observed attacks, or weaponization indicators.
Researcher notes
The key constraint is privilege: admin profile plus read-write permissions are required. The bundle does not provide affected command names, patch versions, or detection indicators, so validation should focus on version exposure, privileged access paths, and vendor advisory follow-up.
Mitigation direction
Inventory FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions against the affected ranges.
Review Fortinet FG-IR-26-122 for vendor-supported upgrade or workaround guidance.
Review Siemens SSA-975644 where Siemens-managed or Siemens-integrated deployments may be relevant.
Restrict administrative CLI access to named, trusted administrators using least privilege.
Monitor for unexpected file write or delete activity by privileged administrators.
Validation and detection
Confirm exact product family and version for each Fortinet appliance or virtual instance.
Identify administrator accounts with read-write permissions and CLI access.
Review privileged admin activity logs for unusual file operations or configuration changes.
Check vendor advisories for fixed versions before scheduling remediation.
Document Siemens advisory applicability if Siemens products or managed environments are present.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-22: File access and web shell behavior lookup
File traversal and upload weaknesses can lead teams to review file, web shell, execution, and collection telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-22 · source CWE mapping
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.