LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-60535: A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component /endpoints/currency/currency of Wallos v4.1.1 allows a...

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component /endpoints/currency/currency of Wallos v4.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary operations via a crafted GET request.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-60535 is a reported CSRF issue in Wallos v4.1.1. A victim’s browser could be induced to send a crafted GET request to the currency endpoint, potentially causing unintended operations. The record rates it high severity, but public source details are limited and no CISA KEV listing is reported.

Executive priority

Prioritize review within normal high-severity remediation timelines, faster for internet-facing Wallos. Business risk is unauthorized application changes through browser-based request forgery. The urgency is meaningful, but evidence does not currently support claims of known exploitation.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-352 in /endpoints/currency/currency in Wallos v4.1.1. The stated impact is arbitrary operations via crafted GET request, with CVSS 3.1 score 7.3. The record does not provide a named fixed version, vendor advisory, or detailed exposure prerequisites beyond the affected component reference.

Likely exposure

Organizations running Wallos v4.1.1 are the primary concern, especially if the application is reachable by users through browsers. Exposure is higher where Wallos is internet-accessible or used from unmanaged browsing environments. The CVE metadata does not define broader affected versions.

Exploitation context

No active exploitation is established in the provided sources, and the CVE is not marked in CISA KEV. The issue is described as triggerable through a crafted GET request, but public details are sparse. Treat public-facing Wallos deployments as higher priority for review.

Researcher notes

The public CVE record lacks detailed affected-version range, patch status, and exploit telemetry. The CVSS vector lists no user interaction, which is unusual for CSRF and should be verified against upstream details. Avoid assuming impact beyond Wallos v4.1.1 and the named endpoint.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Wallos upstream guidance for a patched release or official mitigation.
  • Inventory and prioritize any Wallos v4.1.1 deployments.
  • Restrict Wallos access to trusted networks or VPN where feasible.
  • Avoid exposing Wallos directly to the public internet.
  • Review application logs for unexpected currency endpoint activity.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Wallos v4.1.1 is deployed.
  • Check whether /endpoints/currency/currency is reachable in your environment.
  • Review whether state-changing requests have CSRF protection.
  • Verify access controls around Wallos administrative functions.
  • Monitor vendor repository and CVE sources for fix details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-60535 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L3.93.4CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-60535Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.