LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-60304: code-projects Simple Scheduling System 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the Subject Desc...

code-projects Simple Scheduling System 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the Subject Description field.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-60304 is a cross-site scripting issue in code-projects Simple Scheduling System 1.0 through the Subject Description field. A crafted entry could run script in another user's browser if that user views the affected content. The supplied sources do not name a patch or confirmed exploitation.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate web application risk. It is not reported as actively exploited, but internet-facing or multi-user deployments should be reviewed promptly because XSS can support session theft, phishing, or unauthorized user actions.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 XSS with CVSS 3.1 score 6.1: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact. The vulnerable input is identified only as the Subject Description field.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to deployments of code-projects Simple Scheduling System 1.0 where users can submit or view Subject Description content. The official affected-product metadata is incomplete and lists vendor, product, and versions as n/a.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing, public exploitation, or weaponized activity. Exploitation would require a victim to interact with or view affected application content. Treat exploit status as unconfirmed.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE record and referenced write-up identify XSS via Subject Description, but the supplied bundle does not establish exploit maturity, patch availability, authentication context, or whether the flaw is stored or reflected.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the project or vendor guidance for a fixed release or official workaround.
  • Prioritize upgrade or removal if Simple Scheduling System 1.0 is internet-facing.
  • Restrict untrusted access to schedule creation and subject description entry points.
  • If maintaining code, review output encoding and input handling for Subject Description.
  • Monitor web logs for suspicious script-like content in scheduling fields.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether code-projects Simple Scheduling System 1.0 is deployed anywhere.
  • Identify routes or forms that accept Subject Description values.
  • Review whether submitted descriptions are rendered back to users without safe encoding.
  • Check dependency, asset, and application inventories for unsupported local copies.
  • Document findings because CVE affected-product metadata is incomplete.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-60304 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-60304Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.