LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-59571: WordPress WorkScout-Core plugin < 1.7.06 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in purethemes WorkScout-Core workscout-core allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects WorkScout-Core: from n/a through < 1.7.06.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A flaw in the WorkScout-Core WordPress plugin (used by job board sites built on the WorkScout theme) lets an attacker craft a malicious link that, when clicked by a logged-in user or visitor, runs unauthorized scripts in their browser. This can be used to hijack sessions, steal data displayed on the page, or trick users into actions they did not intend.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority patch for any site running WorkScout-Core, especially public job boards where admins regularly handle user-submitted content. Risk is real but contained to plugin users and requires a victim to click a crafted link. Schedule remediation within standard high-severity SLAs and confirm with the marketing or web team that no fix is being deferred.

Technical view

CVE-2025-59571 is a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79) vulnerability in purethemes WorkScout-Core through version 1.7.06. The plugin fails to neutralize input before reflecting it into rendered output. CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L (7.1 high) reflects unauthenticated network reach, required user interaction, and a scope change indicating impact beyond the vulnerable component into the user's browser context.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the WorkScout-Core plugin (commonly bundled with the WorkScout job board theme by purethemes) at versions through 1.7.06. Public-facing job board, recruiting, and marketplace sites are the typical deployment. Sites without the plugin or already on a fixed release are not exposed.

Exploitation context

No CISA KEV listing and no public exploitation reporting is cited in the bundle. The flaw is reflected XSS, so exploitation requires luring a target to a crafted URL (phishing, social posts, or malicious redirects). Scope-changed impact means a successful click can affect authenticated admin or user sessions, not just anonymous visitors.

Researcher notes

Reflected XSS with scope change (S:C) indicates the payload can affect a security authority other than the vulnerable component, typical of DOM or response reflection that crosses into the admin or another origin context. Affected metadata in the CVE record lists "versions: 0" with defaultStatus unaffected, which is a CVE List quirk; rely on the description's "n/a through < 1.7.06" range. No CWE-79 sink, parameter, or proof-of-concept is disclosed in the cited Patchstack entry preview, so confirm specifics directly from Patchstack and vendor changelog before authoring detections.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for WorkScout-Core and confirm installed version.
  • Update WorkScout-Core to a release after 1.7.06 once vendor publishes a fix; check Patchstack and purethemes advisories.
  • If no patch is available, restrict plugin exposure via WAF rules that filter reflected XSS payloads on WorkScout endpoints.
  • Enforce a strict Content Security Policy and HttpOnly, Secure session cookies to limit XSS impact.
  • Require admins to avoid clicking untrusted links to the site and use separate browsers or profiles for admin work.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm plugin presence and version via wp-admin Plugins page or wp-content/plugins/workscout-core/ metadata.
  • Cross-reference the installed version against the Patchstack advisory and vendor changelog for a fixed release.
  • Review web server and WAF logs for suspicious query strings targeting WorkScout endpoints with script-like payloads.
  • After patching, re-test the previously vulnerable parameters using a controlled XSS scanner to confirm output encoding.
  • Verify CSP headers and cookie flags are present on responses from the affected site.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-59571 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-59571Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
purethemesWorkScout-Coreworkscout-core, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.