LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-5932: Homerunner <= 1.0.30 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Settings Update

The Homerunner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.30. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the main_settings() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Homerunner for WordPress through version 1.0.30 can let an attacker change plugin settings by persuading an administrator to trigger a forged request. The attacker does not need an account, but administrator interaction is required. Expected impact is limited to settings integrity; the supplied evidence does not establish data theft, service disruption, or code execution.

Executive priority

Schedule remediation in the normal near-term patch cycle, escalating sites where Homerunner controls business-sensitive checkout settings. The moderate rating reflects required administrator interaction and limited documented impact. Immediate emergency response is not supported by the supplied evidence, but exposed outdated installations should not remain indefinitely because unauthenticated attackers can target authenticated administrators.

Technical view

The main_settings() function lacks correct WordPress nonce validation, creating a cross-site request forgery vulnerability classified as CWE-352. Exploitation is network-accessible, requires low complexity and administrator interaction, and can modify plugin settings. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3 with integrity impact only. The supplied record identifies versions through 1.0.30 as vulnerable.

Likely exposure

WordPress sites using the Homerunner plugin at version 1.0.30 or earlier are potentially exposed, especially when administrators browse untrusted links while authenticated. The bundle’s structured affected-version entry is inconsistent with its title and description, so asset owners should confirm installed package identity and version directly.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in KEV. A successful attack requires an administrator to perform an attacker-influenced action, such as following a crafted link, while able to change plugin settings. No exploit payload or broader compromise chain is established by the evidence.

Researcher notes

The key defect is absent or incorrect nonce validation in main_settings(). The pre-fix and 1.0.31 source references may support code comparison, but the bundle does not explicitly state that 1.0.31 is the fixed release. The structured affected data lists version “0” with default unaffected, conflicting with the narrative range; validate authoritative vendor metadata before automated fleet decisions.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify every WordPress site running Homerunner and record its installed version.
  • Update beyond version 1.0.30 after confirming current vendor guidance and compatibility.
  • If updating is unavailable, disable the plugin until vendor-supported remediation is confirmed.
  • Warn administrators against opening untrusted links while authenticated to WordPress.
  • Review plugin settings for unauthorized changes and restore approved values.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the installed plugin slug and version on each WordPress instance.
  • Verify production no longer runs Homerunner version 1.0.30 or earlier.
  • Compare current plugin settings with approved configuration or recent backups.
  • Review relevant administrative logs for unexpected settings changes or suspicious requests.
  • Confirm the remediated settings handler performs appropriate nonce validation and authorization checks.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-5932 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
4Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Wordfence

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-5932Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. Source timelineWordfence

    Disclosed

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
coolrunnerHomerunner0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.