LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-58034: An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability...

An Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.1, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.11, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 may allow an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code on the underlying system via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands.

MediumCVSS 6.7Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Fortinet FortiWeb flaw lets an attacker who already has admin-level access run their own commands on the underlying device, potentially taking it over. FortiWeb is a web application firewall that protects internet-facing apps, so a compromised FortiWeb can become a foothold against everything it guards. Fortinet has published an advisory; affected organizations should apply vendor-recommended fixes promptly.

Executive priority

Patch on an expedited change cadence — days, not weeks. The privilege requirement bounds the risk, but FortiWeb fronts business-critical web applications, so a compromised appliance undermines the very controls it provides and any incident response will be costly.

Technical view

CVE-2025-58034 is an OS command injection (CWE-78) in Fortinet FortiWeb affecting 8.0.0–8.0.1, 7.6.0–7.6.5, 7.4.0–7.4.10, 7.2.0–7.2.11, and 7.0.0–7.0.11. An authenticated, high-privilege attacker can execute arbitrary OS commands via crafted HTTP requests or CLI commands. CVSS 3.1 base is 6.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H); the temporal vector reports E:F (functional exploit) and RL:O (official fix).

Likely exposure

FortiWeb appliances typically sit at the application edge and are often reachable from the internet for management or HA. The flaw requires high-privilege authentication, so realistic exposure is bounded to environments where admin credentials can be obtained, reused, or were previously compromised. Managed-service and multi-tenant FortiWeb deployments expand blast radius when admin accounts are shared.

Exploitation context

The CVSS temporal vector indicates a functional exploit (E:F) with confirmed reporting (RC:C). The provided bundle records kev=false and no source confirms in-the-wild exploitation. The Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-25-513 is the authoritative reference. Treat any privileged FortiWeb administrative session as a high-value target until patched, especially on internet-reachable management interfaces.

Researcher notes

PR:H means a valid admin or equivalent session is a precondition; watch for chaining with auth bypass, credential theft, or weak admin password reuse. E:F indicates working exploit code likely exists. Monitor Fortinet PSIRT and the CISA KEV catalog for status changes after the bundle's last update (2026-02-26); validate fixed builds directly from the vendor advisory rather than secondary sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade FortiWeb to fixed builds per Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-25-513.
  • Restrict FortiWeb management and CLI access to trusted admin subnets only.
  • Rotate administrative credentials and enforce MFA where supported by the platform.
  • Audit and minimize accounts with admin or equivalent CLI/HTTP privileges.
  • Increase logging and alerting on FortiWeb admin sessions and CLI command execution.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all FortiWeb appliances and record exact firmware version per device.
  • Compare each version against affected ranges listed in FG-IR-25-513.
  • Confirm post-upgrade build matches Fortinet's stated fixed release.
  • Review admin login history and CLI logs for unexpected commands or sessions.
  • Check management interface exposure with an external scan and internal ACL review.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-58034 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.7CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C1.25.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.7Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-58034Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortiWeb7.6.0, 7.4.0, 7.2.0, 7.0.2unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.