CVE-2025-57893: WordPress WP Fast Total Search Plugin <= 1.79.270 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search fulltext-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Fast Total Search: from n/a through <= 1.79.270.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-57893 is a CSRF issue in the WordPress WP Fast Total Search plugin, package fulltext-search, affecting versions through 1.79.270. A successful attack could cause a user to perform an unintended action, with low integrity impact. The public sources do not describe the exact vulnerable action or a confirmed fix.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate WordPress plugin risk. It does not currently justify emergency response from the supplied evidence, but affected sites should be identified and remediated during normal vulnerability management, especially where WordPress administration is business-critical.
Technical view
The CVE lists CWE-352, CVSS 3.1 score 4.3, vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N. This indicates remote attackability with low complexity, no attacker privileges, required user interaction, and limited integrity impact. Available sources identify the plugin and version range but not endpoint details, nonce behavior, or remediation status.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to WordPress installations using Epsiloncool WP Fast Total Search/fulltext-search through version 1.79.270. The source bundle does not identify affected actions, required victim role, or whether default configurations are vulnerable.
Exploitation context
No cited source or KEV listing indicates active exploitation. Exploitation would require user interaction, consistent with CSRF risk, but the public bundle does not provide enough detail to assess practical exploitability or business impact beyond low integrity impact.
Researcher notes
Public details are sparse. The bundle confirms CSRF classification, affected plugin/version range, and CVSS vector, but not the vulnerable request, nonce validation failure, privilege context, exploit maturity, or fixed release. Avoid assuming broader WordPress impact.
Mitigation direction
Inventory WordPress sites for WP Fast Total Search/fulltext-search installations.
Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for a fixed version or official mitigation.
Prioritize update or removal for installations at or below 1.79.270.
Limit administrative access and use caution with unsolicited links while remediation is pending.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether WP Fast Total Search/fulltext-search is installed on each WordPress site.
Record installed plugin versions and flag versions at or below 1.79.270.
Review Patchstack and CVE records for updated remediation status.
Check recent administrative changes for unexpected modifications if the plugin is present.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-352 · source CWE mapping
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.