LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-57571: Tenda F3 V12.01.01.48_multi and after is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow.

Tenda F3 V12.01.01.48_multi and after is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow. via the macFilterList parameter in goform/setNAT.

MediumCVSS 5.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-57571 is a reported buffer overflow in Tenda F3 firmware V12.01.01.48_multi and later. The issue is tied to the macFilterList parameter in goform/setNAT. The available sources rate it medium severity, with possible limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate network-device risk. Prioritize inventory and management-plane exposure review first, then apply vendor guidance when available. Urgency rises if affected routers are internet-exposed or placed near sensitive networks.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-120 buffer overflow behavior in the goform/setNAT handler through macFilterList. CVSS 3.1 is 5.6: network reachable, high attack complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and low CIA impact. Structured affected-product metadata is incomplete in the source bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to Tenda F3 devices running V12.01.01.48_multi and later, based on the CVE description. The bundled affected-product fields are n/a and no CPEs are listed, so asset matching may require firmware inventory rather than scanner-only detection.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. A public GitHub researcher reference exists, but the provided evidence does not establish in-the-wild exploitation or vendor-confirmed exploitability details.

Researcher notes

The useful facts are narrow: Tenda F3, firmware V12.01.01.48_multi and after, macFilterList in goform/setNAT, CWE-120, CVSS 5.6. Missing CPEs, vendor/product normalization, and patch information reduce confidence in automated detection and remediation specificity.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Tenda guidance for affected firmware and any fixed release.
  • Restrict router management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Avoid exposing administrative interfaces to the internet.
  • Segment affected routers away from sensitive internal systems.
  • Monitor for unexpected configuration changes or device instability.
  • Replace unsupported devices if no vendor fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Tenda F3 routers and record firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether V12.01.01.48_multi or later is deployed.
  • Review external exposure of router administration services.
  • Check vulnerability scanner results against actual firmware inventory.
  • Look for vendor advisories or release notes before remediation.
  • Document uncertainty where CPE-based matching is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-120: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-57571 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.6CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L2.23.4CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.6Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-57571Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-120 · source CWE mapping

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.