CVE-2025-57174: An issue was discovered in Siklu Communications Etherhaul 8010TX and 1200FX devices, Firmware 7.4.0 through...
An issue was discovered in Siklu Communications Etherhaul 8010TX and 1200FX devices, Firmware 7.4.0 through 10.7.3 and possibly other previous versions. The rfpiped service listening on TCP port 555 which uses static AES encryption keys hardcoded in the binary. These keys are identical across all devices, allowing attackers to craft encrypted packets that execute arbitrary commands without authentication. This is a failed patch for CVE-2017-7318. This issue may affect other Etherhaul series devices with shared firmware.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This vulnerability can let an unauthenticated attacker remotely run commands on affected Siklu Etherhaul wireless backhaul devices. The issue comes from shared hardcoded encryption keys in a service exposed on TCP port 555. For organizations using these devices in telecom, ISP, or enterprise backhaul roles, compromise could affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of network infrastructure.
Executive priority
Treat as urgent for any organization operating affected Siklu Etherhaul devices. The issue is remotely reachable, unauthenticated, and rated CVSS 9.8. Prioritize exposure reduction immediately while confirming vendor remediation options.
Technical view
CVE-2025-57174 affects Siklu Etherhaul 8010TX and 1200FX firmware 7.4.0 through 10.7.3, and possibly other shared-firmware Etherhaul devices. The rfpiped service on TCP/555 uses static AES keys hardcoded in the binary and shared across devices, enabling crafted encrypted packets to execute arbitrary commands without authentication. It is described as a failed patch for CVE-2017-7318.
Likely exposure
Exposure is highest where affected Etherhaul devices have TCP port 555 reachable from untrusted networks. Devices used for wireless backhaul may sit at network edges, increasing business impact if management or service ports are not tightly filtered.
Exploitation context
The CVE record and referenced research describe unauthenticated remote command execution. The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Public technical research is referenced, so defenders should assume capable attackers can study the issue.
Researcher notes
The source data lists vendor and product fields as n/a but the description names Etherhaul 8010TX and 1200FX. Scope may include other Etherhaul devices sharing firmware, but that is not confirmed. No official patch details are included in the provided sources.
Mitigation direction
Check Siklu guidance for fixed firmware or official mitigation.
Restrict TCP port 555 to trusted management networks only.
Block internet access to device management and service ports.
Isolate affected backhaul devices from critical internal systems.
Prioritize replacement or upgrade if no vendor fix is available.
Validation and detection
Inventory Siklu Etherhaul 8010TX and 1200FX devices.
Confirm firmware versions, especially 7.4.0 through 10.7.3.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-321: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-321 · source CWE mapping
Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.