LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-56224: A lack of rate limiting in the One-Time Password (OTP) verification endpoint of SigningHub v8.6.8 allows at...

A lack of rate limiting in the One-Time Password (OTP) verification endpoint of SigningHub v8.6.8 allows attackers to bypass verification via a bruteforce attack.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-56224 describes missing rate limiting on the OTP verification endpoint in SigningHub v8.6.8. If exposed, attackers may repeatedly guess one-time codes and bypass verification. The public metadata marks this high severity, but affected-product metadata is incomplete and no active exploitation is confirmed in the provided sources.

Executive priority

High priority for organizations running SigningHub v8.6.8, especially where OTP verification protects sensitive document-signing workflows. Confirm exposure quickly, then follow vendor guidance or apply compensating controls until a fixed version is verified.

Technical view

The issue is categorized as CWE-307: improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.1 with network attack vector, no privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The source bundle only names SigningHub v8.6.8 in the description; structured affected fields are marked n/a.

Likely exposure

Organizations using SigningHub v8.6.8 with internet-accessible or broadly reachable OTP verification workflows should treat this as potentially material. Exposure cannot be confirmed from CPE data because the provided affected-product metadata is incomplete.

Exploitation context

The CVE description states bypass via brute force against OTP verification. The provided data does not show CISA KEV listing, confirmed in-the-wild exploitation, or vendor remediation details. A public GitHub reference exists, but its contents are not summarized in the bundle.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE metadata and one GitHub reference. The affected table lacks vendor, product, version, and CPE detail, so validation should focus on local asset inventory and endpoint behavior without assuming broader product impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Check SigningHub vendor guidance for affected versions and fixed releases.
  • Prioritize upgrade or vendor-approved mitigation if SigningHub v8.6.8 is deployed.
  • Enforce OTP rate limiting or lockout through supported application controls.
  • Use gateway or WAF throttling only as a compensating control.
  • Monitor OTP verification failures and unusual repeated attempts.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory SigningHub deployments and confirm exact version numbers.
  • Identify whether OTP verification endpoints are externally reachable.
  • Review authentication logs for repeated OTP failures per user, IP, or session.
  • Confirm whether rate limiting, lockout, or throttling is active.
  • Track vendor advisories for patch or configuration guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-307: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-56224 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.25.9CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-56224Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-307 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.