CVE-2025-55618: In Hyundai Navigation App STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d, an attacker can inject HTML payloads in the profile...
In Hyundai Navigation App STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d, an attacker can inject HTML payloads in the profile name field in navigation app which then get rendered.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This CVE describes HTML injection in a Hyundai Navigation App profile name field. If a vulnerable build renders attacker-controlled profile names as HTML, it could affect displayed content and potentially user trust or data shown in the navigation interface.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority validation item if your fleet, lab, or product environment uses the named Hyundai navigation build. Business urgency is lower if the build is absent or isolated, because active exploitation is not evidenced in the provided sources.
Technical view
CVE-2025-55618 is mapped to CWE-79. The reported issue is improper neutralization of HTML input in the profile name field of Hyundai Navigation App STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d. CVSS 3.1 is 7.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely limited to systems running Hyundai Navigation App build STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d. The CVE record does not provide CPEs, formal vendor/product identifiers, or a complete affected-version range.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. A public GitHub reference exists, but the supplied evidence does not establish real-world abuse, weaponized exploitation, or vendor-confirmed exploit conditions.
Researcher notes
The main gap is affected-product precision: vendor, product, versions, and CPEs are listed as n/a in the source bundle. Do not generalize this to all Hyundai systems without additional vendor confirmation. Focus validation on the exact named build.
Mitigation direction
Check Hyundai or navigation software vendor guidance for fixed builds or mitigations.
Restrict who can modify navigation profiles until remediation is confirmed.
Avoid sharing profile data from untrusted sources or external users.
Prioritize update testing on vehicles or systems running the named build.
Document compensating controls if vendor remediation is not yet available.
Validation and detection
Inventory navigation app builds and identify STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d instances.
Review the CVE record and linked researcher reference for affected-build details.
In an authorized lab, test whether profile names render as HTML using harmless markers.
Confirm whether later vendor builds sanitize or encode the profile name field.
Record whether exposure is production, test-only, or no longer present.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-79 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.