LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-55618: In Hyundai Navigation App STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d, an attacker can inject HTML payloads in the profile...

In Hyundai Navigation App STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d, an attacker can inject HTML payloads in the profile name field in navigation app which then get rendered.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE describes HTML injection in a Hyundai Navigation App profile name field. If a vulnerable build renders attacker-controlled profile names as HTML, it could affect displayed content and potentially user trust or data shown in the navigation interface.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority validation item if your fleet, lab, or product environment uses the named Hyundai navigation build. Business urgency is lower if the build is absent or isolated, because active exploitation is not evidenced in the provided sources.

Technical view

CVE-2025-55618 is mapped to CWE-79. The reported issue is improper neutralization of HTML input in the profile name field of Hyundai Navigation App STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d. CVSS 3.1 is 7.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely limited to systems running Hyundai Navigation App build STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d. The CVE record does not provide CPEs, formal vendor/product identifiers, or a complete affected-version range.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. A public GitHub reference exists, but the supplied evidence does not establish real-world abuse, weaponized exploitation, or vendor-confirmed exploit conditions.

Researcher notes

The main gap is affected-product precision: vendor, product, versions, and CPEs are listed as n/a in the source bundle. Do not generalize this to all Hyundai systems without additional vendor confirmation. Focus validation on the exact named build.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Hyundai or navigation software vendor guidance for fixed builds or mitigations.
  • Restrict who can modify navigation profiles until remediation is confirmed.
  • Avoid sharing profile data from untrusted sources or external users.
  • Prioritize update testing on vehicles or systems running the named build.
  • Document compensating controls if vendor remediation is not yet available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory navigation app builds and identify STD5W.EUR.HMC.230516.afa908d instances.
  • Review the CVE record and linked researcher reference for affected-build details.
  • In an authorized lab, test whether profile names render as HTML using harmless markers.
  • Confirm whether later vendor builds sanitize or encode the profile name field.
  • Record whether exposure is production, test-only, or no longer present.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-55618 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L3.93.4CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-55618Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.