CVE-2025-55130: A flaw in Node.js’s Permissions model allows attackers to bypass `--allow-fs-read` and `--allow-fs-write` r...
A flaw in Node.js’s Permissions model allows attackers to bypass `--allow-fs-read` and `--allow-fs-write` restrictions using crafted relative symlink paths. By chaining directories and symlinks, a script granted access only to the current directory can escape the allowed path and read sensitive files. This breaks the expected isolation guarantees and enables arbitrary file read/write, leading to potential system compromise.
This vulnerability affects users of the permission model on Node.js v20, v22, v24, and v25.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This flaw weakens Node.js permission controls intended to confine file access. Code allowed to read or write only the current directory may escape that boundary through crafted relative symlink paths, potentially exposing secrets or modifying files outside the approved area.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority platform hardening issue where Node.js permissions protect secrets, tenant data, or build infrastructure. Lower priority if the permission model is not used.
Technical view
CVE-2025-55130 affects Node.js users relying on the permission model with --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write on v20, v22, v24, and v25. The issue is a relative symlink path bypass, mapped to CWE-281 and CWE-289, with CVSS 7.1 high severity.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in services, CI jobs, plugins, sandboxes, or automation that execute Node.js code while depending on permission flags for filesystem isolation.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector indicates local access with low complexity and low privileges, no user interaction. The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation.
Researcher notes
Evidence supports a permissions bypass through chained directories and relative symlinks. Public sources in the bundle do not provide exploit details, exploit-in-the-wild evidence, or complete fixed-version semantics.
Mitigation direction
Review Node.js December 2025 security release guidance.
Upgrade Node.js using vendor-supported fixed packages where available.
Apply relevant Red Hat security errata for managed platforms.
Avoid relying solely on Node permission flags for hostile code isolation.
Use OS or container filesystem boundaries for stronger containment.
Validation and detection
Inventory Node.js v20, v22, v24, and v25 deployments.
Identify processes launched with --allow-fs-read or --allow-fs-write.
Check whether untrusted or semi-trusted scripts run in those processes.
Confirm installed Node.js package status against vendor advisories.
Review CI and plugin execution paths for filesystem isolation assumptions.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-281: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
2CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
21Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
2 official scores
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-281 · source CWE mapping
Improper Preservation of Permissions
Improper Preservation of Permissions represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.