CVE-2025-52904: File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope
File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. In versions of the web application on the 2.x branch, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server. Until this issue is fixed, the maintainers recommend to completely disable `Execute commands` for all accounts. Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration. This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
File Browser versions before 2.33.8 can let enabled command execution ignore the user’s assigned file scope. If an affected instance has this dangerous feature turned on, a privileged attacker could read or change files beyond their intended directory boundary.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority configuration and upgrade issue, especially for internet-facing or shared File Browser deployments. The business risk is unauthorized access to files the server can manage, but exploitation depends on the dangerous command feature being enabled.
Technical view
CVE-2025-52904 is a CWE-77 command execution scope-enforcement flaw in filebrowser/filebrowser 2.x versions >=2.0.0 and <2.33.8. The Command Execution feature is not restricted to the user’s configured scope, creating high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact across server-managed files.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to affected File Browser 2.x deployments where Execute commands was enabled. The advisory says exploitation requires the instance administrator to enable the feature despite warnings.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not indicate known active exploitation, and KEV is false. The CVSS vector requires network access and high privileges, with no user interaction. Risk rises if admin or command-enabled accounts are compromised.
Researcher notes
Severity is tempered by AC:H and PR:H, but impact is broad because command execution crosses File Browser scope boundaries. Evidence supports affected versions, default-disable behavior in 2.33.8, and the vendor recommendation to disable Execute commands.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade to File Browser v2.33.8 or later where command execution is disabled by default.
Disable Execute commands for all accounts until vendor guidance confirms safe use.
Review File Browser configuration for any command execution enablement.
Follow the GitHub advisory and project issue for remediation updates.
Validation and detection
Inventory File Browser instances and confirm versions are not below 2.33.8.
Verify Execute commands is disabled for all accounts and groups.
Check whether any affected instance was internet-accessible or broadly reachable.
Review application and host logs for unexpected command execution activity.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
7Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-77 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.