LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-52609: HCL iControl was affected by Missing Security Headers vulnerability.

HCL iControl was affected by Missing Security Headers vulnerability. which lead to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks by enabling the built-in XSS filtering mechanisms of modern web browsers.

LowCVSS 3.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

HCL iControl 4.0.0 is reported to have missing security headers that could weaken browser protections and lead to XSS-related integrity impact. The published severity is low, with no evidence in the bundle of active exploitation or broad operational impact.

Executive priority

Treat this as a low-priority but real hygiene issue. Address during the next maintenance window unless iControl is internet-facing or supports sensitive workflows, in which case validate exposure sooner.

Technical view

CVE-2025-52609 maps to CWE-693 and has CVSS 3.1 score 3.7. The vector is network-accessible, high complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, no confidentiality or availability impact, and low integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to HCL iControl version 4.0.0. The source bundle lists default status as unaffected outside the named affected version, but does not provide deployment prevalence or internet-exposure data.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked CISA KEV. The described issue concerns missing browser security headers that may permit XSS-related integrity impact under high-complexity conditions.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: the bundle provides affected version, CVSS, CWE, and a vendor KB link, but not detailed header names, exploit prerequisites, or remediation text. Avoid assuming affected branches or fixes beyond HCL guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Review HCL KB0131041 for vendor-approved remediation or configuration guidance.
  • Prioritize systems running HCL iControl 4.0.0 for vendor guidance review.
  • Limit external exposure of administrative or sensitive iControl interfaces.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for patch, workaround, or version status updates.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory HCL iControl deployments and identify any version 4.0.0 instances.
  • Compare HTTP response headers against HCL KB0131041 guidance.
  • Confirm any vendor-recommended update or configuration change was applied.
  • Use authorized vulnerability scanning to verify the finding is no longer reported.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-52609 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.7 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.7CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.21.4HCL

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.7Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-52609Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HCLiControl4.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.