Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pik Online Yazılım Çözümleri A.Ş. Pik Online allows Server Side Request Forgery.
This issue affects Pik Online: before 3.1.5.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-5260 is a high-severity server-side request forgery issue in PozitifIK's Pik Online. An unauthenticated network attacker may be able to make the application send unintended server-side requests, potentially exposing internal data. The public record says Pik Online versions before 3.1.5 are affected.
Executive priority
Treat this as a near-term remediation item for any organization running Pik Online. The business concern is potential server-side access to internal resources or sensitive data, with no user interaction or credentials required according to the CVSS vector.
Technical view
The issue is classified as CWE-918 SSRF with CVSS 3.1 score 8.6: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L. Sources identify Pik Online before 3.1.5 as affected. Public source details do not describe vulnerable endpoints, payloads, or vendor mitigation specifics beyond the affected version boundary.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to organizations using Pik Online before version 3.1.5, especially if the application is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, hosting details, or a full product deployment model.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates unauthenticated, low-complexity network attack conditions, but public details are sparse and do not confirm exploit availability.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to CVE metadata and Turkish government advisory references. Do not assume endpoint details, exploit maturity, or compensating controls from the public record. Focus validation on version state, exposure, and vendor advisory follow-up.
Mitigation direction
Identify all Pik Online deployments and record current versions.
Upgrade affected Pik Online instances to 3.1.5 or later.
Check the Turkish government advisory and vendor guidance for specific remediation notes.
Prioritize externally reachable deployments before internal-only systems.
Monitor application and network logs for unusual server-initiated requests.
Validation and detection
Confirm deployed Pik Online versions are not earlier than 3.1.5.
Verify internet-facing inventory for any exposed Pik Online instances.
Review change records to confirm upgrade completion across environments.
Check logs for unexpected outbound requests from Pik Online servers.
Document any unresolved instances with owner, exposure, and remediation date.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-918 · source CWE mapping
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.