LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-5260: SSRF in PozitifIK's Pik Online

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Pik Online Yazılım Çözümleri A.Ş. Pik Online allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Pik Online: before 3.1.5.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-5260 is a high-severity server-side request forgery issue in PozitifIK's Pik Online. An unauthenticated network attacker may be able to make the application send unintended server-side requests, potentially exposing internal data. The public record says Pik Online versions before 3.1.5 are affected.

Executive priority

Treat this as a near-term remediation item for any organization running Pik Online. The business concern is potential server-side access to internal resources or sensitive data, with no user interaction or credentials required according to the CVSS vector.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-918 SSRF with CVSS 3.1 score 8.6: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L. Sources identify Pik Online before 3.1.5 as affected. Public source details do not describe vulnerable endpoints, payloads, or vendor mitigation specifics beyond the affected version boundary.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations using Pik Online before version 3.1.5, especially if the application is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, hosting details, or a full product deployment model.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates unauthenticated, low-complexity network attack conditions, but public details are sparse and do not confirm exploit availability.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE metadata and Turkish government advisory references. Do not assume endpoint details, exploit maturity, or compensating controls from the public record. Focus validation on version state, exposure, and vendor advisory follow-up.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Pik Online deployments and record current versions.
  • Upgrade affected Pik Online instances to 3.1.5 or later.
  • Check the Turkish government advisory and vendor guidance for specific remediation notes.
  • Prioritize externally reachable deployments before internal-only systems.
  • Monitor application and network logs for unusual server-initiated requests.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm deployed Pik Online versions are not earlier than 3.1.5.
  • Verify internet-facing inventory for any exposed Pik Online instances.
  • Review change records to confirm upgrade completion across environments.
  • Check logs for unexpected outbound requests from Pik Online servers.
  • Document any unresolved instances with owner, exposure, and remediation date.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-5260 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L3.94.7TR-CERT

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.6High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-5260Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Pik Online Yazılım Çözümleri A.Ş.Pik Online0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.