Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Agorum core open versions 11.9.2 and 11.10.1 reportedly allow improper access control that can let an attacker gain Administrator privileges and reach sensitive components or information. The public record rates impact as medium, but privilege escalation inside a document or information-management system can create meaningful business risk.
Executive priority
Treat this as a moderate-priority remediation item unless Agorum holds sensitive business records or is broadly accessible to users. In those cases, prioritize faster validation because administrator escalation can undermine confidentiality and system trust.
Technical view
CVE-2025-52166 is mapped to CWE-284 and describes incorrect access control in Agorum core open 11.9.2 and 11.10.1. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, no user interaction, low confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact. The description says authenticated attackers, while the vector lists PR:N.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to organizations running Software GmbH Agorum core open 11.9.2 or 11.10.1. The provided structured affected-product data is incomplete and lists no CPEs, so asset owners should confirm product identity and versions directly against vendor or advisory records.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The vulnerability requires careful handling because it concerns privilege escalation to Administrator, but public evidence here does not support claims of known exploitation.
Researcher notes
The record has an evidence gap: the description says authenticated attackers, but the CVSS vector includes PR:N. Avoid assuming exact preconditions without the vendor advisory. No exploit details, patch version, or CPE data are present in the provided bundle.
Mitigation direction
- Check the vendor and Herolab advisory for official fixed versions or configuration guidance.
- Inventory Agorum core open deployments and prioritize versions 11.9.2 and 11.10.1.
- Restrict access to trusted users until vendor remediation is confirmed.
- Review administrator accounts and remove unnecessary elevated privileges.
- Monitor for unexpected role changes or access to sensitive components.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether Agorum core open 11.9.2 or 11.10.1 is deployed.
- Compare installed versions with the CVE and vendor advisory records.
- Review audit logs for unusual privilege changes or administrative access.
- Validate access-control behavior in a non-production environment using approved test accounts.
- Document whether compensating controls limit authenticated user access.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup
Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2025-52166 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 6.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N3.92.5CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
6.5MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://herolab.usd.de/usd-2025-0028/CVE reference, mitre
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Access Control
Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.