LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-51678: An issue was discovered in RISC-V PicoRV32 commit 87c89a.

An issue was discovered in RISC-V PicoRV32 commit 87c89a. A mismatch in the PCPI INSN and memory address can lead to unexpected behavior.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-51678 describes a high-severity reliability flaw in the PicoRV32 RISC-V CPU core at commit 87c89a. A mismatch involving PCPI instruction handling and a memory address can cause unexpected behavior, with availability impact rated high. The source bundle does not identify affected commercial products or a confirmed patch.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted engineering validation item for teams using PicoRV32. It is high severity, but current evidence does not identify broad product exposure or active exploitation. Priority should rise if PicoRV32 is present in production, safety-sensitive, or remotely reachable systems.

Technical view

The CVE links the issue to PicoRV32 commit 87c89a and describes a PCPI INSN versus memory-address mismatch. The record maps it to CWE-119 and CWE-704 and assigns CVSS 3.1 score 7.5, with no confidentiality or integrity impact and high availability impact. Technical details are limited in the provided sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where PicoRV32 at or derived from commit 87c89a is used in RISC-V FPGA, ASIC, or SoC designs. The provided CVE data lists no CPEs, vendor names, product versions, or downstream affected devices.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV status is false. Public references appear to be disclosure and research material. The CVSS vector indicates network reachability, no privileges, and no user interaction, but the bundle does not document a real-world exploit path.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The CVE names a specific PicoRV32 commit and broad weakness classes, but affected versions, fix commit, reproducer details, and downstream product mapping are not provided in the bundle. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the stated CVSS and references.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory designs for PicoRV32 commit 87c89a or derived forks.
  • Review the upstream GitHub issue for maintainer guidance or fixes.
  • Check vendor or integrator guidance for downstream products using PicoRV32.
  • Prioritize replacement or verification if the affected core is production-facing.
  • Track the CVE record for affected-product and remediation updates.

Validation and detection

  • Search hardware manifests, HDL dependencies, and build metadata for PicoRV32.
  • Confirm the exact upstream commit or fork baseline in each design.
  • Review PCPI integration tests for instruction and memory-address mismatch behavior.
  • Check whether any downstream vendor advisory maps this CVE to your product.
  • Document unknowns where product mapping or fix status remains unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-119: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-704: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-51678 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-51678Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-119 · source CWE mapping

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer

Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-704 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast

Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.