Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-51627 is an access-control flaw in the CaricaVerbale function of Agenzia Impresa Eccobook v2.81.1. Public information says a low-level authenticated user can gain Administrator privileges. This is mainly a business risk where Eccobook is used for sensitive operational records or administrative workflows.
Executive priority
Prioritize if Eccobook v2.81.1 supports regulated, financial, or operational processes. The issue can convert limited access into administrator control, but current public evidence does not confirm active exploitation or a named patch.
Technical view
The issue is categorized as CWE-284: Improper Access Control. The CVE description states that CaricaVerbale in Eccobook v2.81.1 allows privilege escalation to Administrator. The record lists CVSS 3.1 score 6.5, but its vector shows PR:N while the description says authenticated low-level access, so validation should confirm real prerequisites.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to organizations running Agenzia Impresa Eccobook v2.81.1, especially internet-accessible or broadly user-accessible deployments. The CVE metadata does not provide CPEs or broader affected-version ranges.
Exploitation context
A public GitHub disclosure/PoC reference exists, but the provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Treat this as publicly documented and practical to validate, not proven exploited in the wild.
Researcher notes
The CVE data is sparse: affected vendor/product fields are n/a, and the CVSS vector conflicts with the narrative authentication requirement. The GitHub disclosure is the key technical reference, but avoid assuming affected ranges or fixes beyond Eccobook v2.81.1.
Mitigation direction
- Identify whether Eccobook v2.81.1 is deployed in your environment.
- Check Agenzia Impresa or application supplier guidance for patches or supported remediation.
- Restrict Eccobook access to trusted networks and required users only.
- Review and minimize low-privilege accounts until vendor guidance is applied.
- Monitor administrative role changes and CaricaVerbale-related activity.
Validation and detection
- Confirm installed Eccobook version and whether CaricaVerbale is enabled.
- Review user roles for unexpected Administrator privileges.
- Check logs for recent privilege changes by low-level users.
- Ask the vendor or maintainer to confirm fixed versions or compensating controls.
- Track the CVE record for updates to affected versions and scoring.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup
Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2025-51627 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 6.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N3.92.5CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
6.5MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/CapgeminiCisRedTeam/Disclosure/blob/main/CVE%20PoC/CVE-2025-51627%20%7C%20Eccobook.mdCVE reference, mitre
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Access Control
Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.