LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-5089: Arista EOS SysDB Agent Denial of Service via Malformed CVX Client/Server Messages

In a CVX cluster, an EOS switch connected to a CVX server is not resilient to certain malformed messages received from the connected CVX server. Similarly, the CVX server is not resilient to certain malformed messages received from the connected EOS switch. This leads to either a Sysdb agent crash on the EOS device causing a soft reset of the switch or agent crashes on the CVX server causing instability of the CVX cluster. An attacker could use this behavior to create a denial of service (DoS) scenario. Note that this would require the attacker to already have a high privilege access to the connected device to be able to send custom TCP packets. EOS switches that are not connected to a CVX server are not impacted.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-5089 is an Arista EOS/CVX availability issue. Malformed messages between an EOS switch and a CVX server can crash agents, causing an EOS soft reset or CVX cluster instability. The cited scope is limited to EOS switches connected to CVX; standalone EOS switches are not affected.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority operational resilience issue for Arista CVX environments. It is not described as a data theft or remote unauthenticated compromise issue, but a successful DoS could disrupt critical switching or CVX cluster stability.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-20 improper input validation in CVX client/server message handling. A malformed message from a connected CVX server can crash Sysdb on EOS, while a malformed message from a connected EOS switch can crash CVX server agents. The CVSS 4.0 score is 7.1 with high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Arista environments using CVX clusters with EOS switches connected to CVX servers, especially versions listed in the source bundle. EOS switches not connected to CVX are explicitly stated as not impacted.

Exploitation context

The sources do not show KEV listing or active exploitation. The bundle says exploitation would require already having high-privilege access to a connected device to send custom TCP packets, reducing broad internet-driven risk but leaving insider or compromised-admin scenarios relevant.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are important: affected topology requires EOS connected to CVX, and the source bundle states high-privilege access to a connected device is needed. No exploit evidence, patch version, or workaround detail beyond vendor advisory review is provided in the supplied sources.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Arista advisory 0126 for vendor-approved fixed versions or mitigations.
  • Inventory CVX clusters and EOS switches connected to CVX servers.
  • Prioritize upgrades or vendor guidance for listed affected EOS/CVX versions.
  • Restrict privileged access to EOS and CVX management paths.
  • Monitor for Sysdb crashes, EOS soft resets, or CVX cluster instability.

Validation and detection

  • Identify EOS devices that are connected to CVX servers.
  • Compare EOS/CVX versions against the affected versions in the advisory bundle.
  • Confirm standalone EOS switches are not treated as affected exposure.
  • Review logs for Sysdb agent crashes or unexpected soft resets.
  • Check CVX server logs for agent crashes or cluster instability.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-5089 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NArista
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H2.83.6Arista

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.1High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-5089Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Arista NetworksEOS / CloudVision eXchange (CVX)4.34.0F, 4.33.0M, 4.32.0M, 4.31.0M, 4.30.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.