LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-49917: WordPress Icegram Express Pro plugin <= 5.9.5 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Icegram Icegram Express Pro email-subscribers-premium allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Icegram Express Pro: from n/a through <= 5.9.5.

MediumCVSS 4.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-49917 is a server-side request forgery flaw in the WordPress Icegram Express Pro plugin through version 5.9.5. An attacker with high privileges may be able to make the website server send unintended requests. The published severity is medium, with limited confidentiality and integrity impact.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin issue. It does not show evidence of active exploitation, but affected sites should be identified and remediated through normal vulnerability management, especially on public-facing or business-critical WordPress systems.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-918 SSRF in package email-subscribers-premium, affecting Icegram Express Pro <= 5.9.5. CVSS 3.1 is 4.4: network exploitable, high attack complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress environments running Icegram Express Pro/email-subscribers-premium at version 5.9.5 or earlier. Risk is higher where many high-privilege WordPress users exist or administrative accounts are weakly controlled.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not indicate active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires high privileges and high complexity, reducing broad opportunistic risk. Successful abuse could still help reach internal or metadata endpoints from the web server context.

Researcher notes

Patch status is not provided in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming a fixed version. The main validation focus is confirming affected plugin presence and privilege exposure, then tracking vendor/Patchstack remediation details.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Icegram Express Pro/email-subscribers-premium installations.
  • If version is <= 5.9.5, check Icegram or Patchstack guidance for an update or workaround.
  • Remove or disable the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict high-privilege WordPress accounts and enforce strong authentication.
  • Limit server outbound access to internal services where feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed plugin name and version across all WordPress assets.
  • Flag any Icegram Express Pro installation at version 5.9.5 or earlier.
  • Review who has high-privilege WordPress access on affected sites.
  • Check vendor or Patchstack records for patched-version information.
  • Review logs for unusual server-initiated requests tied to plugin activity.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-49917 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N1.32.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-49917Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
IcegramIcegram Express Proemail-subscribers-premium, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.