CVE-2025-4948: Libsoup: integer underflow in soup_multipart_new_from_message() leading to denial of service in libsoup
A flaw was found in the soup_multipart_new_from_message() function of the libsoup HTTP library, which is commonly used by GNOME and other applications to handle web communications. The issue occurs when the library processes specially crafted multipart messages. Due to improper validation, an internal calculation can go wrong, leading to an integer underflow. This can cause the program to access invalid memory and crash. As a result, any application or server using libsoup could be forced to exit unexpectedly, creating a denial-of-service (DoS) risk.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-4948 can crash software that uses libsoup when it handles specially crafted multipart HTTP messages. The business impact is service interruption, not data theft, based on the provided sources. It is rated high because a network attacker needs no login or user interaction to trigger availability loss.
Executive priority
Prioritize remediation in the next regular security patch cycle, faster for internet-facing or business-critical services using libsoup. The risk is meaningful availability disruption, but the provided evidence does not support claims of data compromise or known active exploitation.
Technical view
The flaw is an integer underflow in libsoup's soup_multipart_new_from_message() during multipart message processing. Improper validation can lead to invalid memory access and process crash. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely on systems running affected Red Hat libsoup or libsoup3 packages, especially applications or servers that parse untrusted multipart HTTP content through libsoup. The bundle lists multiple affected RHEL 7 ELS, 8, 9, 10, and update-service variants. RHEL 6 status is listed as unknown.
Exploitation context
The source bundle says KEV is false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. The described attack condition is a specially crafted multipart message reaching software that uses the vulnerable libsoup function. Treat exposure as application-dependent rather than universal across every installed package.
Researcher notes
Focus validation on reachability: vulnerable packages matter most when an application passes attacker-controlled multipart messages into libsoup. The public bundle does not provide exploit details, a workaround, or fixed upstream version data. Red Hat product status is detailed; non-Red Hat ecosystem impact needs vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Apply the relevant Red Hat security errata for affected RHEL packages.
Check GNOME/libsoup and operating-system vendor guidance for fixed package versions.
Prioritize internet-facing services that parse multipart HTTP content through libsoup.
Where patching is delayed, reduce exposure to untrusted multipart inputs where operationally possible.
Monitor vendor advisories because the bundle does not name a standalone workaround.
Validation and detection
Inventory installed libsoup and libsoup3 packages across Linux hosts.
Map exposed applications that link to libsoup and accept multipart HTTP content.
Confirm Red Hat errata applicability for each RHEL stream in use.
Verify patched package deployment through normal vulnerability management evidence.
Review crash telemetry for unexpected libsoup-linked process exits.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-191: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-191 · source CWE mapping
Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)
Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.