LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-4948: Libsoup: integer underflow in soup_multipart_new_from_message() leading to denial of service in libsoup

A flaw was found in the soup_multipart_new_from_message() function of the libsoup HTTP library, which is commonly used by GNOME and other applications to handle web communications. The issue occurs when the library processes specially crafted multipart messages. Due to improper validation, an internal calculation can go wrong, leading to an integer underflow. This can cause the program to access invalid memory and crash. As a result, any application or server using libsoup could be forced to exit unexpectedly, creating a denial-of-service (DoS) risk.

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-4948 can crash software that uses libsoup when it handles specially crafted multipart HTTP messages. The business impact is service interruption, not data theft, based on the provided sources. It is rated high because a network attacker needs no login or user interaction to trigger availability loss.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation in the next regular security patch cycle, faster for internet-facing or business-critical services using libsoup. The risk is meaningful availability disruption, but the provided evidence does not support claims of data compromise or known active exploitation.

Technical view

The flaw is an integer underflow in libsoup's soup_multipart_new_from_message() during multipart message processing. Improper validation can lead to invalid memory access and process crash. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems running affected Red Hat libsoup or libsoup3 packages, especially applications or servers that parse untrusted multipart HTTP content through libsoup. The bundle lists multiple affected RHEL 7 ELS, 8, 9, 10, and update-service variants. RHEL 6 status is listed as unknown.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says KEV is false and provides no evidence of active exploitation. The described attack condition is a specially crafted multipart message reaching software that uses the vulnerable libsoup function. Treat exposure as application-dependent rather than universal across every installed package.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on reachability: vulnerable packages matter most when an application passes attacker-controlled multipart messages into libsoup. The public bundle does not provide exploit details, a workaround, or fixed upstream version data. Red Hat product status is detailed; non-Red Hat ecosystem impact needs vendor confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the relevant Red Hat security errata for affected RHEL packages.
  • Check GNOME/libsoup and operating-system vendor guidance for fixed package versions.
  • Prioritize internet-facing services that parse multipart HTTP content through libsoup.
  • Where patching is delayed, reduce exposure to untrusted multipart inputs where operationally possible.
  • Monitor vendor advisories because the bundle does not name a standalone workaround.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory installed libsoup and libsoup3 packages across Linux hosts.
  • Map exposed applications that link to libsoup and accept multipart HTTP content.
  • Confirm Red Hat errata applicability for each RHEL stream in use.
  • Verify patched package deployment through normal vulnerability management evidence.
  • Review crash telemetry for unexpected libsoup-linked process exits.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
12

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-191: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-4948 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
1ADP providers
16Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6redhat

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-4948Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineredhat

    Made public.

  2. Source timelineredhat

    Reported to Red Hat.

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown vendorlibsouplibsoup, 0unaffected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10libsoup3, 0:3.6.5-3.el10_0.6affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.2-9.el7_9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.2-6.el7_9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoup, 0:2.62.3-9.el8_10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8libsoup, 0:2.62.3-9.el8_10affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.2 Advanced Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.3-1.el8_2.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.4 Advanced Mission Critical Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.3-2.el8_4.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Advanced Mission Critical Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Telecommunications Update Servicelibsoup, 0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Update Services for SAP Solutionslibsoup, 0:2.62.3-2.el8_6.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.62.3-3.el8_8.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9libsoup, 0:2.72.0-10.el9_6.2affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 Update Services for SAP Solutionslibsoup, 0:2.72.0-8.el9_0.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.2 Extended Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.72.0-8.el9_2.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4 Extended Update Supportlibsoup, 0:2.72.0-8.el9_4.5affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6libsoupunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-191 · source CWE mapping

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.