LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-49433: WordPress Supermalink <= 1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in ThanhD Supermalink supermalink allows DOM-Based XSS.This issue affects Supermalink: from n/a through <= 1.1.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-49433 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Supermalink plugin up to version 1.1. It could let an authenticated attacker influence what a user’s browser runs after user interaction. The available sources do not show active exploitation or a named fixed version.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin issue. It is not currently supported by evidence of active exploitation, but it should be handled in normal vulnerability remediation cycles, faster for public sites or environments with many WordPress users.

Technical view

The issue is classified as CWE-79 DOM-based XSS in ThanhD Supermalink. The CVSS 3.1 score is 6.5 with network attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, user interaction required, and changed scope. Public technical detail is limited in the supplied sources.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running the Supermalink plugin with versions through 1.1. The source bundle has no CPEs and limited affected-version metadata, so validate by plugin slug, installed version, and vendor record rather than asset scanners alone.

Exploitation context

The provided data does not indicate known active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The CVSS vector implies exploitation requires low privileges and user interaction, reducing broad automated risk but still creating concern for sites with untrusted contributors or complex admin workflows.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse beyond the CVE metadata and Patchstack entry. Avoid assuming exploitability details, affected endpoints, or a fixed version from the supplied bundle. The main validation challenge is reliable plugin identification because CPE data is absent.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Supermalink plugin.
  • Check vendor or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not required.
  • Restrict WordPress accounts that can reach affected plugin functionality.
  • Prioritize remediation on public or multi-user WordPress sites.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed plugin slug and version on each WordPress site.
  • Verify whether any instance runs Supermalink version 1.1 or earlier.
  • Review vendor and Patchstack records for updated remediation guidance.
  • After mitigation, confirm the plugin is updated, disabled, or removed.
  • Document exceptions where the plugin remains installed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-49433 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.33.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-49433Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
ThanhDSupermalinksupermalink, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.