CVE-2025-49176: Xorg-x11-server-xwayland: xorg-x11-server: tigervnc: integer overflow in big requests extension
A flaw was found in the Big Requests extension. The request length is multiplied by 4 before checking against the maximum allowed size, potentially causing an integer overflow and bypassing the size check.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A local user can abuse a size-checking flaw in Xorg/Xwayland/TigerVNC components. The bug can let an oversized request pass validation, creating risk of data exposure, tampering, or service disruption on affected Red Hat systems.
Executive priority
Handle as high-priority Linux endpoint and remote desktop patching. Business risk is highest where many users share GUI-capable systems or where TigerVNC/Xwayland supports operational access.
Technical view
The Big Requests extension multiplies request length by 4 before enforcing the maximum allowed size. That arithmetic can overflow, bypassing the intended size check. CVSS 3.1 is 7.3 with local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, and high integrity and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely on affected Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems running xorg-x11-server, xorg-x11-server-Xwayland, or tigervnc packages, especially GUI, VDI, remote desktop, and shared Linux hosts.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires local access and low privileges, but no user interaction.
Researcher notes
Evidence supports an integer overflow in Big Requests size validation. The bundle provides affected Red Hat package streams and advisories, but not exploit proof, exploit maturity, or fixed-version detail beyond advisory references.
Mitigation direction
Apply the relevant Red Hat RHSA updates for affected RHEL streams.
Check Red Hat guidance for fixed package versions before rollout.
Prioritize shared workstations, VDI, jump hosts, and TigerVNC systems.
Limit local account access on affected GUI or remote desktop hosts.
Retire unsupported or extended-life systems where updates are unavailable.
Validation and detection
Inventory installed xorg-x11-server, Xwayland, and tigervnc packages.
Compare package versions against the affected versions in the CVE record.
Confirm applicable Red Hat advisories are installed on each RHEL stream.
Review VDI and remote desktop images for stale vulnerable packages.
Document exceptions where vendor-fixed packages are not available.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-190 · source CWE mapping
Integer Overflow or Wraparound
Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.