LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-48703: CWP (aka Control Web Panel or CentOS Web Panel) before 0.9.8.1205 allows unauthenticated remote code execut...

CWP (aka Control Web Panel or CentOS Web Panel) before 0.9.8.1205 allows unauthenticated remote code execution via shell metacharacters in the t_total parameter in a filemanager changePerm request. A valid non-root username must be known.

CriticalCVSS 9Known exploitedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-48703 is a critical flaw in CWP before 0.9.8.1205 that can let an unauthenticated remote attacker run commands if they know a valid non-root username. Because CISA lists it in KEV, treat exposed CWP systems as urgent.

Executive priority

Prioritize emergency remediation for any exposed CWP instance. The issue enables remote command execution, has critical severity, and is listed by CISA as known exploited.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-78 OS command injection in filemanager changePerm request handling. Shell metacharacters in t_total can lead to remote code execution. CVSS 3.1 is 9.0: network, no privileges, no user interaction, scope changed, high impact, with high attack complexity.

Likely exposure

Highest exposure is CWP or CentOS Web Panel deployments before 0.9.8.1205 reachable from untrusted networks. Risk depends on panel exposure and whether valid non-root usernames can be discovered or guessed.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV inclusion indicates known exploitation. The supplied sources do not quantify exploitation scale, campaigns, or attacker tooling, so assume credible active risk without inferring broader details.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports unauthenticated RCE with a known valid non-root username prerequisite. Avoid assuming root-level execution, exploit prevalence, or specific campaigns beyond KEV status. Focus validation on version, exposure, and relevant request telemetry.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade CWP to 0.9.8.1205 or later per vendor guidance.
  • Restrict CWP administrative access to trusted networks or VPN only.
  • Review CISA KEV deadlines and internal emergency patch policy.
  • Check vendor changelog for any additional hardening guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all CWP or CentOS Web Panel instances and versions.
  • Confirm no deployment remains below 0.9.8.1205.
  • Check whether CWP is internet-accessible or exposed to broad internal networks.
  • Review logs for suspicious filemanager changePerm activity.
  • Assess whether non-root usernames are publicly exposed or easily guessable.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-48703 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
Yes
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CISA KEV status

Status
Known exploited
Source
CISA / ADP
Date added
Not provided

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H2.26Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-48703Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
centos-webpanelCentOS Web Panel0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.