LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-46531: WordPress WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads) plugin <= 3.4 - Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) Vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ankur Vishwakarma WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads) woozap allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads): from n/a through <= 3.4.

MediumCVSS 4.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A WordPress plugin used for automation can be abused by a logged-in low-privilege user to make the web server send unintended requests. The reported impact is limited confidentiality and integrity exposure, not site takeover. The sources do not identify active exploitation or a confirmed fixed version.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress plugin risk. It should be handled in routine vulnerability remediation, faster for externally exposed sites with many user accounts or broad server egress. It is not supported by the supplied sources as an emergency exploited-in-the-wild issue.

Technical view

CVE-2025-46531 is an SSRF issue in WP AVCL Automation Helper, formerly WPFlyLeads, package woozap, affecting versions through 3.4. CVSS 3.1 is 4.9 with network access, high complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality/integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with WP AVCL Automation Helper or WPFlyLeads woozap installed at version 3.4 or earlier. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires a low-privilege authenticated account. Actual reach depends on what internal or external network resources the WordPress server can access.

Exploitation context

The supplied bundle does not report known exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. The high attack complexity and privilege requirement reduce urgency, but SSRF can matter where WordPress servers can reach internal services or sensitive metadata endpoints.

Researcher notes

The public details provided are sparse: no vulnerable endpoint, proof-of-concept, patch version, or vendor advisory detail is included beyond the affected range and SSRF classification. Avoid assuming unauthenticated reachability. Validation should start with plugin presence, version, privileges, and network egress exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the woozap plugin and installed version.
  • Check vendor, WordPress, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if no maintained fixed version is available.
  • Limit plugin access to trusted accounts only.
  • Restrict outbound network access from WordPress where operationally feasible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether WP AVCL Automation Helper or WPFlyLeads is installed.
  • Verify whether the installed version is 3.4 or earlier.
  • Review web and application logs for unusual outbound request patterns.
  • Check whether the WordPress host can reach sensitive internal services.
  • Document compensating controls if immediate removal is not possible.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-46531 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N1.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-46531Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Ankur VishwakarmaWP AVCL Automation Helper (formerly WPFlyLeads)woozap, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.