LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-46524: WordPress WP Filter Post Category plugin <= 2.1.4 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) to Stored XSS vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in stesvis WP Filter Post Category wp-filter-post-categories allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Filter Post Category: from n/a through <= 2.1.4.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-46524 affects the WordPress WP Filter Post Category plugin through version 2.1.4. A CSRF flaw can lead to stored cross-site scripting, meaning malicious script could be saved in the site and later run in a user’s browser. The provided sources do not name a fixed version.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure check, especially for customer-facing sites. The main business risk is stored browser-side script execution affecting users or administrators. Because no fixed version is named in the provided evidence, prioritize inventory, removal where feasible, and close monitoring for vendor guidance.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-352 CSRF in stesvis WP Filter Post Category, package wp-filter-post-categories, enabling stored XSS. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1 high with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, and required user interaction. The bundle does not identify the vulnerable endpoint, exploit details, or a patch release.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with WP Filter Post Category/wp-filter-post-categories installed at version 2.1.4 or earlier. Sites without this plugin are not indicated as affected. Prioritize externally managed WordPress estates, client sites, and sites with administrator sessions used from normal browsing environments.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not state active exploitation, and KEV is false. Exploitation would require user interaction consistent with CSRF and stored XSS risk. Because the public sources omit endpoint and patch details, assume uncertainty and avoid treating this as confirmed weaponized activity.

Researcher notes

Sources confirm CSRF to stored XSS but omit endpoint, nonce behavior, required victim role, proof-of-concept details, and fixed-version information. Validate only in authorized environments and avoid offensive reproduction steps. Research should focus on version identification, configuration exposure, and whether maintainers have published remediation guidance.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for wp-filter-post-categories installations.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where business impact is acceptable.
  • Check vendor, WordPress, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release.
  • Upgrade promptly if an official fixed version becomes available.
  • Limit administrator browsing sessions and enforce strong WordPress admin hygiene.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether WP Filter Post Category is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record plugin versions and flag any version 2.1.4 or earlier.
  • Review site content and plugin-managed fields for unexpected stored scripts.
  • Check security monitoring for suspicious WordPress admin activity.
  • Document compensating controls where removal is delayed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-46524 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Patchstack

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-46524Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
stesvisWP Filter Post Categorywp-filter-post-categories, 0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.