LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-45869: LogicalDOC Enterprise Version up to and before v9.1.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

LogicalDOC Enterprise Version up to and before v9.1.1 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An unauthenticated attacker can exploit the ShareFileCallback servlet by manipulating input parameters to trigger a server-side request to an attacker-controlled host.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-45869 is a high-severity SSRF issue in LogicalDOC Enterprise versions before v9.1.1. An unauthenticated attacker may cause the server to make outbound requests to an attacker-controlled host. Business risk depends on whether LogicalDOC is internet-facing and what internal services the server can reach.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority application risk if LogicalDOC is externally reachable. The issue is unauthenticated and can create a bridge from the application server to internal or attacker-controlled destinations. Confirm version exposure and vendor remediation status promptly.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-918 server-side request forgery in the ShareFileCallback servlet. The reported attack path uses manipulated input parameters to trigger server-side requests. CVSS 3.1 is 7.3, with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. The record does not list CPEs or detailed vendor remediation.

Likely exposure

Organizations running LogicalDOC Enterprise versions before v9.1.1 are potentially exposed, especially if the application is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, deployment details, or asset discovery indicators.

Exploitation context

The CVE states exploitation is unauthenticated and network-accessible. CISA KEV is false in the provided data, and the sources do not establish active exploitation in the wild. Public disclosure details exist on GitHub, increasing the need for timely validation.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description and referenced disclosure. The affected product is named in the title and description, but structured affected CPE data is absent. Do not assume active exploitation or a specific fix beyond checking LogicalDOC guidance and validating versions before v9.1.1.

Mitigation direction

  • Check LogicalDOC vendor guidance and release notes for the corrected version or workaround.
  • Prioritize upgrading LogicalDOC Enterprise if running a version before v9.1.1.
  • Restrict internet access to LogicalDOC where business requirements allow.
  • Limit the LogicalDOC server’s outbound network access to required destinations.
  • Monitor requests involving ShareFileCallback and unusual outbound connections.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all LogicalDOC Enterprise instances and record exact versions.
  • Confirm whether any instance is before v9.1.1.
  • Determine whether LogicalDOC is internet-facing or reachable by untrusted users.
  • Review logs for ShareFileCallback activity and unexpected outbound destinations.
  • Verify compensating egress controls are enforced on LogicalDOC hosts.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-45869 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L3.93.4CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-45869Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.