CVE-2025-45314: A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /Calendar endpoint of hortusfox-web v4.4 allows attackers...
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /Calendar endpoint of hortusfox-web v4.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a user's browser via a crafted payload injected into the add function.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-45314 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting issue in hortusfox-web v4.4. An attacker could cause JavaScript to run in a victim’s browser through the /Calendar add function. This can expose user data or alter page behavior, but it requires user interaction and does not directly compromise the server.
Executive priority
Treat as a moderate-priority web application issue. Prioritize if hortusfox-web v4.4 is internet-facing or supports sensitive workflows. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation, but XSS can affect user trust and session integrity, so remediation tracking is warranted.
Technical view
The CVE describes CWE-79 XSS in the /Calendar endpoint of hortusfox-web v4.4, where crafted input to the add function can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a user browser context. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact.
Likely exposure
Organizations running hortusfox-web v4.4 are the stated exposure group. Risk is higher where the application is internet-accessible or used by multiple authenticated users. The CVE record’s affected product metadata is incomplete, so confirm deployments by application name and version rather than CPE matching.
Exploitation context
Sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Exploitation requires a victim to interact with affected application content. Successful XSS could support session abuse, phishing within the application, or unauthorized actions within the victim’s permissions.
Researcher notes
The public record provides core vulnerability details but limited affected-product metadata and no named fix. The GitHub proof-of-concept reference may contain technical details; handle carefully and avoid testing against systems without authorization. Further analysis should confirm whether later hortusfox-web versions address the issue.
Mitigation direction
Identify any hortusfox-web v4.4 deployments, especially internet-facing instances.
Check the hortusfox-web repository and maintainer guidance for a fixed release or workaround.
Apply vendor-provided updates or mitigations when available.
Limit application exposure to trusted networks where feasible.
Review input handling and output encoding around Calendar add functionality.
Validation and detection
Inventory hortusfox-web instances and record deployed versions.
Confirm whether /Calendar add functionality is enabled and reachable.
Review application logs for suspicious Calendar entries or unusual user-driven script behavior.
Use safe XSS testing in a controlled environment only with authorization.
Monitor vendor repository and CVE record for updated remediation details.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-79 · source CWE mapping
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.