LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-45314: A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /Calendar endpoint of hortusfox-web v4.4 allows attackers...

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /Calendar endpoint of hortusfox-web v4.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of a user's browser via a crafted payload injected into the add function.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-45314 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting issue in hortusfox-web v4.4. An attacker could cause JavaScript to run in a victim’s browser through the /Calendar add function. This can expose user data or alter page behavior, but it requires user interaction and does not directly compromise the server.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority web application issue. Prioritize if hortusfox-web v4.4 is internet-facing or supports sensitive workflows. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation, but XSS can affect user trust and session integrity, so remediation tracking is warranted.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 XSS in the /Calendar endpoint of hortusfox-web v4.4, where crafted input to the add function can execute arbitrary JavaScript in a user browser context. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Organizations running hortusfox-web v4.4 are the stated exposure group. Risk is higher where the application is internet-accessible or used by multiple authenticated users. The CVE record’s affected product metadata is incomplete, so confirm deployments by application name and version rather than CPE matching.

Exploitation context

Sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided bundle. Exploitation requires a victim to interact with affected application content. Successful XSS could support session abuse, phishing within the application, or unauthorized actions within the victim’s permissions.

Researcher notes

The public record provides core vulnerability details but limited affected-product metadata and no named fix. The GitHub proof-of-concept reference may contain technical details; handle carefully and avoid testing against systems without authorization. Further analysis should confirm whether later hortusfox-web versions address the issue.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any hortusfox-web v4.4 deployments, especially internet-facing instances.
  • Check the hortusfox-web repository and maintainer guidance for a fixed release or workaround.
  • Apply vendor-provided updates or mitigations when available.
  • Limit application exposure to trusted networks where feasible.
  • Review input handling and output encoding around Calendar add functionality.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hortusfox-web instances and record deployed versions.
  • Confirm whether /Calendar add functionality is enabled and reachable.
  • Review application logs for suspicious Calendar entries or unusual user-driven script behavior.
  • Use safe XSS testing in a controlled environment only with authorization.
  • Monitor vendor repository and CVE record for updated remediation details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-45314 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-45314Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.