LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-4527: Dígitro NGC Explorer Password Transmission client-side enforcement of server-side security

A security flaw has been discovered in Dígitro NGC Explorer up to 3.44.15/3.48.21. The impacted element is an unknown function of the component Password Transmission Handler. Performing a manipulation results in client-side enforcement of server-side security. The attack can be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. Upgrading to version 3.48.22 is sufficient to resolve this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

MediumCVSS 6.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This issue weakens password transmission security in Dígitro NGC Explorer by relying on client-side enforcement for behavior that should be protected server-side. A remote attacker could potentially manipulate that flow, but the public sources describe exploitation as difficult and high complexity.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted product remediation item, not an emergency internet-wide vulnerability. Upgrade confirmed deployments promptly, especially where remote access exists, because password-handling weaknesses can undermine trust even when exploitation is difficult.

Technical view

CVE-2025-4527 is mapped to CWE-602: client-side enforcement of server-side security. The affected component is the NGC Explorer Password Transmission Handler. The CVSS 4.0 score is 6.3, with network attack vector, no privileges, no user interaction, high complexity, and low confidentiality impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to organizations running Dígitro NGC Explorer, especially versions up to 3.44.15 or 3.48.21. The source identifies a remotely reachable Password Transmission Handler, but does not describe default exposure, internet-facing posture, or specific configurations. Asset inventory and vendor release data are needed to confirm.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. The CVSS vector records exploit maturity as proof-of-concept, while the narrative states exploitation is difficult and high complexity. No exploit steps or reliable attack procedure are provided here.

Researcher notes

There is a source inconsistency: the affected version list includes 3.48.22, while the description says upgrading to 3.48.22 resolves the issue. Use vendor or CTIR guidance to resolve this before asserting final exposure. Public details do not identify the exact vulnerable function.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected NGC Explorer deployments to version 3.48.22 as stated in the advisory text.
  • Check Dígitro and CTIR guidance for any later corrections or operational recommendations.
  • Prioritize systems where NGC Explorer authentication or password flows are remotely reachable.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for clarification on affected version ranges and fixed builds.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Dígitro NGC Explorer versions across production and support environments.
  • Confirm whether any deployment runs 3.44.0-3.44.15 or 3.48.0-3.48.21.
  • Verify the Password Transmission Handler is no longer exposed on upgraded systems.
  • Review logs for unusual password-flow errors or anomalous remote access attempts.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-602: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Credential and access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references authentication or credential exposure, so valid-account and credential-access review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-4527 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.3 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
6Timeline events
1ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.3CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PVulDB
3.7CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C2.21.4VulDB
3.7CVSS 3.0LowCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C2.21.4VulDB
2.6CVSS 2.0LowAV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N/E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C4.92.9VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

6.3Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-4527Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  3. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  4. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

  6. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
DígitroNGC Explorer3.44.0, 3.44.1, 3.44.2, 3.44.3, 3.44.4, 3.44.5, 3.44.6, 3.44.7, 3.44.8, 3.44.9, 3.44.10, 3.44.11, 3.44.12, 3.44.13, 3.44.14, 3.44.15, 3.48.0, 3.48.1, 3.48.2, 3.48.3, 3.48.4, 3.48.5, 3.48.6, 3.48.7, 3.48.8, 3.48.9, 3.48.10, 3.48.11, 3.48.12, 3.48.13, 3.48.14, 3.48.15, 3.48.16, 3.48.17, 3.48.18, 3.48.19, 3.48.20, 3.48.21, 3.48.22Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-602 · source CWE mapping

Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security

Client-Side Enforcement of Server-Side Security represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.