LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-43873: iSTAR Ultra, Ultra SE, Ultra G2, Ultra G2 SE, iSTAR Edge G2 - Authenticated web application command injection - setFaultDebounce

Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities could allow an attacker to modify firmware and gain full access to the device.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated attacker with network access and low privileges could inject operating-system commands through the affected device web application. Successful exploitation could alter firmware and provide full device access, threatening access-control operations, device integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority access-control technology risk. Promptly identify affected devices, isolate management access, and obtain authoritative firmware guidance. Escalate immediately if unauthorized administration, configuration changes, or firmware modification is detected.

Technical view

CVE-2025-43873 is a CWE-78 command-injection flaw associated with setFaultDebounce in the web application. CVSS 4.0 rates it 8.7: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact on the vulnerable device.

Likely exposure

Risk is greatest where an affected iSTAR management interface is reachable from untrusted or broadly accessible networks, or where low-privileged credentials are compromised. The bundle does not establish exact affected firmware versions; its version entry is insufficient for reliable inventory matching.

Exploitation context

The flaw requires authenticated, low-privileged access but no user interaction. The supplied record is not in CISA KEV, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation or public exploit availability. Absence from KEV does not prove that exploitation has not occurred.

Researcher notes

The primary technical evidence is the CWE-78 classification, setFaultDebounce association, and CVSS vector. Product models are named, but reliable affected-version boundaries and a specific fixed release are absent from the supplied bundle. Validation should remain non-destructive and focus on inventory, reachability, access controls, logs, and vendor-confirmed version status.

Mitigation direction

  • Review the current Johnson Controls advisory for confirmed affected firmware and vendor remediation.
  • Apply vendor-provided firmware or configuration updates after operational testing.
  • Restrict device management interfaces to trusted administrative networks and hosts.
  • Remove unnecessary accounts and rotate credentials suspected of compromise.
  • Monitor management activity and firmware changes for unauthorized behavior.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory the listed iSTAR models and record their exact firmware versions.
  • Compare firmware versions against current Johnson Controls and CISA guidance.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks.
  • Review accounts, authentication logs, configuration changes, and firmware integrity indicators.
  • Verify remediation versions and network restrictions after changes.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-43873 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Njci

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-43873Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Johnson ControliSTAR Ultra, iSTAR Ultra SE, iSTAR Ultra G2, iSTAR Ultra G2 SE, iSTAR Edge G20unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-78 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.