LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-41770: Unauthenticated Denial of Service

An unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in the device's PLCnext Engineer communication interface allow an remote attacker to interrupt access via the client application. Successful exploitation prevents communication until the PLCnext service is manually restarted.

HighCVSS 8.7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A remote, unauthenticated attacker who can reach the PLCnext Engineer communication interface may make the client application unable to communicate with the device. Service remains disrupted until PLCnext is manually restarted, creating operational downtime but no reported confidentiality or integrity impact.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority availability risk where affected controllers support important operations or their engineering interface is broadly reachable. Immediately confirm inventory and segmentation, obtain authoritative version guidance, and ensure safe restart procedures. Prioritize exposed or safety-relevant environments first.

Technical view

CVE-2025-41770 is a network-reachable resource-management denial of service classified as CWE-770. It requires no privileges or user interaction and has low attack complexity. CVSS 4.0 rates it 8.7 because successful exploitation causes high device availability impact while leaving confidentiality and integrity unaffected.

Likely exposure

Exposure depends on whether the PLCnext Engineer communication interface is reachable from untrusted or poorly segmented networks. The bundle names multiple Phoenix Contact controllers, but its version entries are marked “unaffected,” so the precise affected-version range cannot be established from the supplied evidence.

Exploitation context

The supplied sources do not establish active exploitation, and the CVE is not identified as being in KEV. Exploitation requires network access to the communication interface but no authentication, privileges, or user interaction. Production testing could cause an outage requiring manual service recovery.

Researcher notes

The supplied product data is internally ambiguous: products and version 2019.0.4 appear under “affected,” while every entry has defaultStatus “unaffected.” Researchers should rely on the referenced Phoenix Contact CSAF advisory for product-status semantics. No patch version, workaround, or proof of exploitation is established in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Obtain the precise affected-version and remediation guidance from the Phoenix Contact advisory.
  • Restrict the PLCnext Engineer interface to authorized engineering hosts and trusted management networks.
  • Block unnecessary access across internet, enterprise, wireless, and third-party network boundaries.
  • Prepare a controlled PLCnext service-restart procedure that accounts for operational safety and availability.
  • Apply vendor-provided updates or mitigations after testing them in a representative environment.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory the named Phoenix Contact products and record their exact firmware or software versions.
  • Compare each asset against the vendor advisory’s authoritative affected and fixed version ranges.
  • Map network paths to the PLCnext Engineer interface from untrusted and lower-trust segments.
  • Review monitoring data for communication failures, service restarts, or unexplained engineering-client outages.
  • Avoid active denial-of-service testing on production operational technology.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-770: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-41770 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NCERTVDE
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H3.93.6CERTVDE

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-41770Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Phoenix ContactAXC F 11522019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactAXC F 12522019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactAXC F 2000 EA2019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactAXC F 21522019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactAXC F 31522019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactBPC 9102S2019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactBPC 9202S2019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactRFC 4072R2019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactRFC 4072S2019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactVL3 UPC 2440 EDGE2019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactVPLCNEXT CONTROL 10002019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactVPLCNEXT CONTROL 20002019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactVPLCNEXT CONTROL 30002019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactVPLCNEXT CONTROL 5002019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactCatan C12019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactEPC 15022019.0.4unaffected
Phoenix ContactEPC 15222019.0.4unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-770 · source CWE mapping

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.