SCIM provisioning was introduced in Grafana Enterprise and Grafana Cloud in April to improve how organizations manage users and teams in Grafana by introducing automated user lifecycle management.
In Grafana versions 12.x where SCIM provisioning is enabled and configured, a vulnerability in user identity handling allows a malicious or compromised SCIM client to provision a user with a numeric externalId, which in turn could allow to override internal user IDs and lead to impersonation or privilege escalation.
This vulnerability applies only if all of the following conditions are met:
- `enableSCIM` feature flag set to true
- `user_sync_enabled` config option in the `[auth.scim]` block set to true
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-41115 is a critical Grafana identity-handling flaw tied to SCIM provisioning. If SCIM user sync is enabled, a malicious or compromised SCIM client could create a user whose external ID collides with internal user IDs, potentially causing impersonation or privilege escalation.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent for Grafana deployments using SCIM. The business risk is account impersonation and privilege escalation in monitoring and operational systems. Non-SCIM deployments appear outside the stated preconditions.
Technical view
In Grafana 12.x with SCIM enabled and configured, numeric SCIM externalId handling can override internal user IDs. The supplied affected entry names Grafana Enterprise 12.0.0. Required conditions are enableSCIM=true and [auth.scim] user_sync_enabled=true. CVSS 3.1 is 10.0 with network attack vector and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to Grafana environments using SCIM provisioning with both required settings enabled. The affected list names Grafana Enterprise 12.0.0; the description also discusses Grafana Cloud and 12.x, so confirm scope against Grafana’s advisory.
Exploitation context
The supplied sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Risk is still high because a malicious or compromised SCIM client could drive identity confusion without user interaction, leading to impersonation or privilege escalation.
Researcher notes
Key uncertainty is exact product scope beyond the affected entry, because the description mentions Grafana Cloud and 12.x while the affected list names Grafana Enterprise 12.0.0. Do not assume broader impact without vendor confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Check Grafana’s advisory for official fixed versions and remediation guidance.
Identify Grafana 12.x instances using SCIM provisioning and user sync.
Disable SCIM user sync where it is not operationally required.
Rotate and restrict SCIM client credentials if compromise is suspected.
Prioritize remediation for internet-facing or privileged Grafana environments.
Validation and detection
Verify Grafana version and edition across managed environments.
Check whether enableSCIM is true in feature flags.
Check whether [auth.scim] user_sync_enabled is true.
Review SCIM provisioning logs for numeric externalId values.
Review recent unexpected user, team, or role changes.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-266: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references privilege impact, so privilege escalation and authorization behavior review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-266 · source CWE mapping
Incorrect Privilege Assignment
Incorrect Privilege Assignment represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.