LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-40901: HTML injection in Credentials Manager in Guardian/CMC before 26.1.0

A Stored HTML Injection vulnerability was discovered in the Credentials Manager functionality due to improper validation of an input parameter. An authenticated user with administrative privileges can define a malicious identity containing HTML tags. When a victim attempts to delete the affected identity, the injected HTML renders in their browser, enabling phishing and possibly open redirect attacks. Full XSS exploitation and direct information disclosure are prevented by the existing input validation and Content Security Policy configuration.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Nozomi Networks Guardian and CMC contain a flaw in the Credentials Manager that lets an already-privileged administrator plant malicious HTML inside an identity name. When another admin later deletes that identity, the injected HTML renders in their browser, opening the door to phishing lures or redirects. Impact is limited because full script execution is blocked by input validation and Content Security Policy.

Executive priority

Schedule as a routine patch cycle item, not an emergency. The bug requires a trusted insider and yields only phishing-grade impact, but regulated and OT-heavy environments should prioritize the upgrade because Siemens has echoed the advisory and admin trust boundaries in monitoring platforms carry outsized reputational risk.

Technical view

Stored HTML injection (CWE-79) in the Credentials Manager of Nozomi Guardian and CMC before 26.1.0. An authenticated administrator can define an identity with unsanitized HTML tags that renders when a victim admin triggers the delete workflow. CVSS 3.1 base 5.9 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L). The vendor states CSP and existing input filters prevent full XSS and direct data exfiltration, constraining the attack to phishing and possible open redirect chains.

Likely exposure

Exposure is confined to organizations running Nozomi Guardian or CMC appliances at versions prior to 26.1.0 where multiple administrators share the Credentials Manager. Siemens has issued a coordinated advisory, suggesting overlap with industrial and OT environments that embed Nozomi sensors. Public-internet reach is not required, but multi-admin OT monitoring consoles are common in enterprise SOC and plant deployments.

Exploitation context

No public exploitation has been reported and the CVE is not on CISA KEV. Exploitation requires an already-authenticated administrator to plant the payload and a second administrator to perform the delete action, so it is realistic only in insider-threat or post-compromise scenarios. Impact is capped at phishing content or redirect abuse because CSP prevents script execution and direct data theft.

Researcher notes

Watch for the payload surface at the identity name/description field in Credentials Manager; rendering occurs on the delete confirmation flow. CSP is credited with blocking script execution, so validate CSP directives are unchanged post-upgrade and not weakened by customer overrides. Open redirect via anchor tags is plausible and worth including in test cases. No public PoC observed; monitor Nozomi and Siemens ProductCERT for updates.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Nozomi Guardian and CMC to version 26.1.0 or later per vendor advisory NN-2026:4-01.
  • Apply Siemens SSA-827968 guidance for OT deployments bundling Nozomi sensors.
  • Restrict Credentials Manager administrative rights to a minimal, audited set of accounts.
  • Enforce multi-factor authentication and session monitoring on all Guardian and CMC admin logins.
  • Review Credentials Manager entries for suspicious HTML or unexpected characters before upgrade.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed Guardian or CMC build against the fixed version listed in NN-2026:4-01.
  • Audit Credentials Manager identity records for tags, angle brackets, or embedded URLs.
  • Review admin audit logs for unusual identity creation or edit events preceding deletions.
  • Verify Content Security Policy headers remain enforced on Guardian and CMC web interfaces.
  • Cross-check Siemens advisory SSA-827968 for any OEM-specific patched build numbers.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-40901 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

2CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

2 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L1.73.7Nozomi
4.8CVSS 4.0MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LNozomi

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

4.8Medium
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-40901Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Nozomi NetworksGuardian0unaffected
Nozomi NetworksCMC0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.