LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-39826: net: rose: convert 'use' field to refcount_t

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: rose: convert 'use' field to refcount_t The 'use' field in struct rose_neigh is used as a reference counter but lacks atomicity. This can lead to race conditions where a rose_neigh structure is freed while still being referenced by other code paths. For example, when rose_neigh->use becomes zero during an ioctl operation via rose_rt_ioctl(), the structure may be removed while its timer is still active, potentially causing use-after-free issues. This patch changes the type of 'use' from unsigned short to refcount_t and updates all code paths to use rose_neigh_hold() and rose_neigh_put() which operate reference counts atomically.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A race in the Linux kernel’s ROSE networking code can free a network-neighbour object while another operation or timer still uses it. This use-after-free could crash the system or potentially compromise confidentiality and integrity. The supplied CVSS score is 8.8, but practical exposure depends on whether affected ROSE functionality is present and reachable.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority kernel remediation for systems using or exposing ROSE networking. Patch those systems promptly, then validate lower-likelihood assets through configuration and vendor-package review. Broad emergency action across every Linux host is not supported by the supplied evidence, and no active exploitation is established.

Technical view

The unsigned-short rose_neigh use counter was non-atomic. Concurrent rose_rt_ioctl() and timer-related paths could reduce it to zero, remove the object, and subsequently access freed memory. The correction converts the field to refcount_t and routes references through atomic rose_neigh_hold() and rose_neigh_put() operations.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Linux systems running affected kernel code where ROSE networking is available and the vulnerable paths are reachable. The bundle lists affected versions but does not provide sufficiently clear range semantics for precise package-level decisions. Distribution, appliance, and embedded-product mappings require confirmation through their vendors.

Exploitation context

The supplied vector indicates adjacent-network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction, with potentially high impact. However, the bundle provides no confirmed exploit, observed attack campaign, or public weaponization evidence. The CVE is not identified as being in CISA KEV.

Researcher notes

The failure is a lifetime-management race involving rose_neigh references, ioctl-driven removal, and an active timer. Review should focus on non-atomic reference transitions and whether downstream kernels contain an equivalent refcount_t backport. Exact affected and fixed package boundaries, exploitability constraints, and real-world exploitation are incomplete in the supplied evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Install a vendor-supported kernel update incorporating the applicable linked stable-kernel correction.
  • Check Debian, Siemens, or other relevant vendor advisories for product-specific fixed versions.
  • Prioritize systems where ROSE networking is enabled, exposed, or operationally required.
  • If updates must wait, restrict adjacent-network access and disable unused ROSE functionality following vendor guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory kernel versions and identify systems with ROSE networking configured or available.
  • Compare each installed vendor package against its applicable security advisory.
  • Verify the running kernel contains the relevant stable commit or vendor backport.
  • After updating, reboot as required and confirm the corrected kernel is running.
  • Review kernel logs for unexplained crashes or use-after-free indicators without treating absence as proof of safety.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
10

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-39826 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
9Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Linux

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-39826Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
siemens-SADPADP container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinux1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2, 1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2unaffected
LinuxLinux2.6.12, 0, 6.1.150, 6.6.104, 6.12.45, 6.16.5, 6.17affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.