CVE-2025-38676: iommu/amd: Avoid stack buffer overflow from kernel cmdline
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
iommu/amd: Avoid stack buffer overflow from kernel cmdline
While the kernel command line is considered trusted in most environments,
avoid writing 1 byte past the end of "acpiid" if the "str" argument is
maximum length.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This Linux kernel issue is a small stack buffer overflow in AMD IOMMU command-line parsing. The public record says it can write one byte past a buffer when a maximum-length kernel command-line argument is supplied. Business risk appears limited by the need to influence boot parameters, but affected Linux fleets should still take vendor kernel updates.
Executive priority
Treat this as a routine but real kernel hygiene item unless your environment allows broad boot-parameter control. No active exploitation is cited, and severity is not scored, but kernel memory corruption in infrastructure should be cleared through standard patch governance.
Technical view
The resolved kernel change is in iommu/amd and prevents a one-byte out-of-bounds stack write involving the acpiid buffer when the str argument reaches maximum length. The CVE record lists multiple affected and fixed Linux kernel versions and stable commits, but provides no CVSS score, CWE, or public impact details.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most plausible on Linux systems using affected kernel versions where AMD IOMMU code is present and kernel boot parameters can be set or modified. Typical production exposure is likely limited because the kernel command line is usually trusted and controlled by administrators or image build pipelines.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show KEV listing, active exploitation, public exploit evidence, or weaponized details. The description frames the kernel command line as trusted in most environments, so exploitation would likely depend on privileged boot-configuration control or compromised provisioning paths.
Researcher notes
Evidence is incomplete: no CVSS, CWE, detailed impact, or exploitability analysis is provided. The most important research question is whether the one-byte stack overwrite can affect meaningful control flow in realistic boot configurations. Avoid assuming reachability beyond command-line influence without vendor or upstream confirmation.
Mitigation direction
Update affected Linux kernels using distribution or vendor advisories.
Review Debian LTS and Siemens advisories if those environments are in scope.
Prioritize systems where boot parameters are externally managed or loosely controlled.
Restrict write access to bootloader, kernel command-line, and image-build configuration.
Monitor vendor guidance for severity, impact, and fixed package details.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions across servers, appliances, and images.
Compare deployed versions with the affected and fixed versions in the CVE record.
Check whether AMD IOMMU is relevant on target hardware or configurations.
Review bootloader and provisioning controls for kernel command-line modification access.
Confirm remediation by verifying vendor-fixed kernel package or stable commit lineage.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2025-38676 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
11Source links
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
Aug 26, 2025, 13:07 UTC (UTC+00:00)
CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.