CVE-2025-38499: clone_private_mnt(): make sure that caller has CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the right userns
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clone_private_mnt(): make sure that caller has CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the right userns
What we want is to verify there is that clone won't expose something
hidden by a mount we wouldn't be able to undo. "Wouldn't be able to undo"
may be a result of MNT_LOCKED on a child, but it may also come from
lacking admin rights in the userns of the namespace mount belongs to.
clone_private_mnt() checks the former, but not the latter.
There's a number of rather confusing CAP_SYS_ADMIN checks in various
userns during the mount, especially with the new mount API; they serve
different purposes and in case of clone_private_mnt() they usually,
but not always end up covering the missing check mentioned above.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2025-38499 is a Linux kernel mount-namespace permission bug. The kernel did not always confirm CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the correct user namespace before cloning a private mount, which could expose mount-hidden content the caller should not be able to reveal. Public severity and CVSS are not provided in the bundle.
Executive priority
Treat this as a kernel hygiene and multi-tenant risk item. There is no cited active exploitation or CVSS score, but affected Linux hosts supporting containers or untrusted users should be prioritized for normal emergency-capable patch cycles.
Technical view
The issue is in clone_private_mnt(). It checked MNT_LOCKED child-mount constraints but missed a user-namespace capability check tied to the namespace owning the mount. The source says existing CAP_SYS_ADMIN checks often, but not always, covered this path. Linux stable commits are referenced as fixes.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant on Linux systems running affected kernel versions, especially hosts with untrusted local users, container workloads, or user namespace and mount namespace activity. The bundle does not identify specific distributions beyond referenced Debian LTS and Siemens advisories.
Exploitation context
The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no evidence of active exploitation, public exploit availability, or remote attackability. Based on the description, exploitation would require reaching kernel mount-namespace behavior under specific local/user-namespace conditions, but exact prerequisites are not fully stated.
Researcher notes
The key research point is the missing CAP_SYS_ADMIN check in the mount owner user namespace inside clone_private_mnt(). The public bundle does not provide a CWE, CVSS vector, proof of concept, or complete distribution matrix, so validation should rely on kernel and vendor advisories.
Mitigation direction
Apply Linux kernel updates containing the referenced stable fixes.
Check distribution and vendor advisories for package-specific fixed versions.
Prioritize multi-tenant, container, and untrusted-user Linux hosts.
Review Debian LTS and Siemens guidance if those environments apply.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2025-38499 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
9Source links
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
Aug 11, 2025, 16:01 UTC (UTC+00:00)
CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.