In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
can: bcm: add missing rcu read protection for procfs content
When the procfs content is generated for a bcm_op which is in the process
to be removed the procfs output might show unreliable data (UAF).
As the removal of bcm_op's is already implemented with rcu handling this
patch adds the missing rcu_read_lock() and makes sure the list entries
are properly removed under rcu protection.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
A Linux kernel race can expose already-freed memory while procfs reports CAN Broadcast Manager operations being removed. The CVSS assessment indicates a local, low-privilege attacker could potentially cause serious confidentiality, integrity, or availability impact, although the supplied description only confirms unreliable output and a use-after-free condition.
Executive priority
Treat this as a high-priority kernel update for systems with untrusted local access or CAN workloads. It is not presented as an internet-remote issue, and active exploitation is unconfirmed. Use normal expedited patching rather than emergency incident measures unless internal evidence indicates abuse.
Technical view
CVE-2025-38003 is a use-after-free race in Linux CAN BCM procfs generation. A bcm_op may be removed while its data is being read for procfs output. The fix adds missing RCU read-side protection and ensures list entries are removed under RCU protection.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to Linux systems within affected kernel branches where CAN BCM procfs activity is reachable. The supplied version data mixes release numbers and commit identifiers and is insufficient for reliable comparison alone. Confirm status against the running distribution kernel and its backport guidance.
Exploitation context
The CVSS vector indicates local access, low privileges, low complexity, and no user interaction. The bundle marks this CVE as absent from KEV, and no supplied source establishes active exploitation or a public exploit. Practical exploitability beyond unreliable procfs data is not demonstrated here.
Researcher notes
The confirmed defect is missing RCU read protection during concurrent procfs traversal and bcm_op removal. The fix addresses reader lifetime and RCU-safe list deletion. Although CVSS assigns high impact across confidentiality, integrity, and availability, the description does not demonstrate privilege escalation, code execution, or a reliable exploitation outcome.
Mitigation direction
Install a vendor-supported kernel containing the referenced RCU protection fix.
Reboot into the updated kernel after installation.
Check distribution guidance when kernel backports make version comparisons inconclusive.
Prioritize systems allowing untrusted local users or using CAN BCM functionality.
Validation and detection
Inventory running kernel releases and installed kernel packages across Linux systems.
Map each distribution kernel to its vendor advisory or backport status.
Confirm the deployed kernel contains the applicable referenced stable fix.
After rebooting, verify the active kernel is the remediated build.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2025-38003 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
11Source links
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.