LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-37925: jfs: reject on-disk inodes of an unsupported type

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: reject on-disk inodes of an unsupported type Syzbot has reported the following BUG: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:668! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 139 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-syzkaller-00085-g4e46774408d9 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x168/0x190 Code: 4c 89 f7 e8 ba fe e5 ff e9 61 ff ff ff 44 89 f1 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 7c c1 4c 89 f7 e8 90 ff e5 ff eb b7 0b e8 01 5d 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f9 5c 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f1 5c 7f RSP: 0018:ffffc900027dfae8 EFLAGS: 00010093 RAX: ffffffff82157a87 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888104d4b980 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc900027dfc90 R08: ffffffff82157977 R09: fffff520004fbf38 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff520004fbf38 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff88811315bc00 R14: ffff88811315bda8 R15: ffff88811315bb80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888135f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005565222e0578 CR3: 0000000026ef0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0 ? die+0x9e/0xc0 ? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10 ? report_bug+0x3cd/0x500 ? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? clear_inode+0x57/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190 jfs_evict_inode+0xb5/0x440 ? __pfx_jfs_evict_inode+0x10/0x10 evict+0x4ea/0x9b0 ? __pfx_evict+0x10/0x10 ? iput+0x713/0xa50 txUpdateMap+0x931/0xb10 ? __pfx_txUpdateMap+0x10/0x10 jfs_lazycommit+0x49a/0xb80 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8f/0x140 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x99/0x150 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_default_wake_function+0x10/0x10 ? __kthread_parkme+0x169/0x1d0 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2f2/0x390 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> This happens when 'clear_inode()' makes an attempt to finalize an underlying JFS inode of unknown type. According to JFS layout description from https://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/jfslayout.pdf, inode types from 5 to 15 are reserved for future extensions and should not be encountered on a valid filesystem. So add an extra check for valid inode type in 'copy_from_dinode()'.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2025-37925 is a Linux kernel JFS filesystem flaw where a malformed on-disk inode type can trigger a kernel BUG during inode cleanup. The practical business risk is denial of service on systems that mount or process untrusted JFS filesystems. The source bundle does not provide CVSS, CWE, or evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted kernel denial-of-service issue, not a confirmed remote compromise. Prioritize patching systems that handle untrusted storage media or filesystem images, and fold remaining systems into normal kernel maintenance unless vendor advisories raise severity.

Technical view

JFS should not encounter inode types 5 through 15, which are reserved by the JFS layout. The kernel fix rejects unsupported on-disk inode types in copy_from_dinode(), preventing clear_inode() from finalizing an invalid JFS inode and hitting a BUG path. Stable kernel fixes are referenced, but affected-version detail is incomplete in the provided bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Linux systems can mount, scan, or otherwise process untrusted JFS filesystem images. Systems not using JFS, or not accepting untrusted filesystems, likely have limited exposure based on the supplied evidence.

Exploitation context

The report originated from syzbot on a syzkaller kernel. The bundle shows KEV is false and provides no cited evidence of in-the-wild exploitation. Exploitation requirements are not fully documented, so assume potential local or image-processing denial-of-service risk until vendor guidance clarifies scope.

Researcher notes

The key fix is validation of dinode type before inode materialization. The public bundle lacks CVSS, CWE mapping, exploitability analysis, and precise affected range semantics. Do not claim active exploitation; KEV is false in the supplied data.

Mitigation direction

  • Update affected Linux kernels to versions containing the referenced stable JFS fix.
  • Check distribution advisories for packaged kernel updates and backports.
  • Avoid mounting untrusted JFS filesystem images on production systems.
  • Restrict JFS support where it is not operationally required.
  • Monitor vendor advisories for CVSS, affected-version, and remediation clarifications.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux systems with JFS support enabled or JFS filesystems mounted.
  • Compare running kernels against distribution advisories and referenced stable commits.
  • Confirm kernel packages include the JFS inode-type validation fix.
  • Review workflows that mount customer, forensic, backup, or removable filesystem images.
  • Document exceptions where JFS cannot be disabled or promptly patched.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-37925 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
8Source links

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinux79ac5a46c5c1c17476fbf84b4d4600d6d565defd, 79ac5a46c5c1c17476fbf84b4d4600d6d565defd, 79ac5a46c5c1c17476fbf84b4d4600d6d565defd, 79ac5a46c5c1c17476fbf84b4d4600d6d565defd, 79ac5a46c5c1c17476fbf84b4d4600d6d565defd, 79ac5a46c5c1c17476fbf84b4d4600d6d565defdunaffected
LinuxLinux3.1, 0, 5.15.190, 6.1.148, 6.6.101, 6.12.41, 6.14.2, 6.15affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.