LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-37750: smb: client: fix UAF in decryption with multichannel

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix UAF in decryption with multichannel After commit f7025d861694 ("smb: client: allocate crypto only for primary server") and commit b0abcd65ec54 ("smb: client: fix UAF in async decryption"), the channels started reusing AEAD TFM from primary channel to perform synchronous decryption, but that can't done as there could be multiple cifsd threads (one per channel) simultaneously accessing it to perform decryption. This fixes the following KASAN splat when running fstest generic/249 with 'vers=3.1.1,multichannel,max_channels=4,seal' against Windows Server 2022: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in gf128mul_4k_lle+0xba/0x110 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881046c18a0 by task cifsd/986 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 986 Comm: cifsd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc1 #1 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_report+0x156/0x528 ? gf128mul_4k_lle+0xba/0x110 ? __virt_addr_valid+0x145/0x300 ? __phys_addr+0x46/0x90 ? gf128mul_4k_lle+0xba/0x110 kasan_report+0xdf/0x1a0 ? gf128mul_4k_lle+0xba/0x110 gf128mul_4k_lle+0xba/0x110 ghash_update+0x189/0x210 shash_ahash_update+0x295/0x370 ? __pfx_shash_ahash_update+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_shash_ahash_update+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_extract_iter_to_sg+0x10/0x10 ? ___kmalloc_large_node+0x10e/0x180 ? __asan_memset+0x23/0x50 crypto_ahash_update+0x3c/0xc0 gcm_hash_assoc_remain_continue+0x93/0xc0 crypt_message+0xe09/0xec0 [cifs] ? __pfx_crypt_message+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x23/0x40 ? __pfx_cifs_readv_from_socket+0x10/0x10 [cifs] decrypt_raw_data+0x229/0x380 [cifs] ? __pfx_decrypt_raw_data+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? __pfx_cifs_read_iter_from_socket+0x10/0x10 [cifs] smb3_receive_transform+0x837/0xc80 [cifs] ? __pfx_smb3_receive_transform+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_smb3_is_transform_hdr+0x10/0x10 [cifs] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x692/0x1570 [cifs] ? __pfx_cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? rcu_is_watching+0x20/0x50 ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x62/0xb0 ? find_held_lock+0x32/0x90 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x11/0x20 ? local_clock_noinstr+0xd/0xd0 ? trace_irq_enable.constprop.0+0xa8/0xe0 ? __pfx_cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x10/0x10 [cifs] kthread+0x1fe/0x380 ? kthread+0x10f/0x380 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ? local_clock_noinstr+0xd/0xd0 ? ret_from_fork+0x1b/0x60 ? local_clock+0x15/0x30 ? lock_release+0x29b/0x390 ? rcu_is_watching+0x20/0x50 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x60 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK>

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A Linux SMB client bug can corrupt kernel memory when encrypted multichannel file-sharing traffic is decrypted concurrently. Affected systems could crash, and the published score rates potential impact as critical. Exposure appears configuration-dependent. The supplied sources contain no evidence of active exploitation, so urgency should focus on locating encrypted multichannel SMB clients and applying vendor-confirmed kernel fixes.

Executive priority

Prioritize exposure verification within 24 hours for Linux systems using encrypted SMB multichannel connections. Expedite vendor-approved kernel updates for confirmed matches. Systems without that configuration have lower demonstrated urgency, although normal kernel maintenance remains appropriate.

Technical view

The CIFS client reused the primary channel's AEAD crypto transform across per-channel cifsd threads. Concurrent synchronous decryption can race over shared crypto state, causing a slab use-after-free in the GHASH/GCM path. KASAN reproduced an invalid read. The evidence establishes a memory-safety failure but does not demonstrate practical code execution or data compromise.

Likely exposure

Most likely exposure is Linux systems acting as SMB clients with multichannel and encryption enabled concurrently. The documented reproduction used SMB 3.1.1, four channels, sealing, and Windows Server 2022. The supplied evidence does not establish exposure for systems outside this configuration pattern.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV status is false, and no supplied source reports active exploitation. The evidence is a KASAN-detected failure during filesystem testing. It does not demonstrate reliable attacker control, code execution, or exploitation in production. The 9.8 CVSS score represents assessed potential impact, not proof of exploitation.

Researcher notes

The supplied affected-version data is ambiguous, including broad releases, specific versions, duplicate commits, and an entry of "0." Four stable fix commits are cited without explicit branch mapping. Validate applicability through the relevant distribution or kernel vendor. Treat confidentiality and integrity impact as scored potential, because the reproduction only establishes an invalid kernel-memory read.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply the distribution or kernel vendor update incorporating the applicable cited stable fix.
  • Until patched, consider disabling SMB multichannel for encrypted mounts after testing operational impact.
  • Restrict SMB client access to trusted servers and networks as defense in depth.
  • Check vendor guidance before changing encryption or production mount settings.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux systems using the CIFS or SMB client and record running kernel versions.
  • Identify mounts using SMB 3.1.1, multichannel, multiple channels, and encryption.
  • Confirm vendor kernel packages contain the applicable cited stable-kernel fix.
  • Review kernel logs for CIFS crashes, KASAN reports, or use-after-free signatures.
  • Regression-test encrypted multichannel mounts after updating, including concurrent traffic across channels.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-37750 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Linux

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2025-37750Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxb0abcd65ec545701b8793e12bc27dc98042b151a, b0abcd65ec545701b8793e12bc27dc98042b151a, b0abcd65ec545701b8793e12bc27dc98042b151a, b0abcd65ec545701b8793e12bc27dc98042b151a, 8f14a476abba13144df5434871a7225fd29af633, ef51c0d544b1518b35364480317ab6d3468f205d, bce966530fd5542bbb422cb45ecb775f7a1a6bc3, 0809fb86ad13b29e1d6d491364fc7ea4fb545995, 538c26d9bf70c90edc460d18c81008a4e555925a, 5.10.237, 5.15.181, 6.1.128, 6.6.57, 6.11.4unaffected
LinuxLinux6.12, 0, 6.12.24, 6.13.12, 6.14.3, 6.15affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.