LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-35998: Missing protection mechanism for alternate hardware interface in the Intel(R) Quick Assist Technology for s...

Missing protection mechanism for alternate hardware interface in the Intel(R) Quick Assist Technology for some Intel(R) Platforms within Ring 0: Kernel may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.

HighCVSS 7.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw affects Intel Quick Assist Technology on some Intel platforms. A local attacker who already has privileged software access could escalate privileges under specific conditions, potentially compromising confidentiality and integrity of the vulnerable system. The bundle does not identify active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority for affected infrastructure, especially shared, security-sensitive, or regulated systems. This is not presented as remotely exploitable or actively exploited, but it can weaken platform trust where privileged local access is possible.

Technical view

The CVE describes missing protection for an alternate hardware interface in Intel QAT within Ring 0/kernel context. CVSS is 7.9 high, local, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, with high confidentiality and integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to systems using affected Intel platforms with Intel Quick Assist Technology. Exact platform models and versions are not listed in the bundle and must be checked against Intel SA-01406 and applicable Red Hat advisories.

Exploitation context

No KEV listing or provided source states active exploitation. The described attack is local, requires a privileged user, special internal knowledge, and present attack requirements, making broad remote exploitation unsupported by the available evidence.

Researcher notes

Key evidence is CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N with CWE-1220 and CWE-1299. The bundle lacks exact affected platform/version details, so validation should remain advisory-driven and avoid assumptions beyond Intel and Red Hat references.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Intel SA-01406 for affected platform details and vendor remediation.
  • Apply applicable Intel platform, firmware, or software updates named by the advisory.
  • For Red Hat systems, review RHSA-2026:6888 and related CVE guidance.
  • Prioritize hosts where Intel QAT is enabled or operationally exposed.
  • Track vendor guidance if exact affected versions are unclear.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems with Intel QAT-capable or QAT-enabled Intel platforms.
  • Compare hardware and software versions against Intel SA-01406.
  • Check Red Hat package applicability against RHSA-2026:6888 where relevant.
  • Confirm remediation status through vendor update records or asset management.
  • Document systems not affected because QAT or listed platforms are absent.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1220: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-1299: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-35998 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

3CVSS vectors
5Timeline events
2ADP providers
6Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

3 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.9CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N1.55.8intel
7.9CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N1.55.8redhat-SADP
7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:Nintel

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-35998Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Made public.

  3. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  4. ADP timelineredhat-SADP

    Reported to Red Hat.

  5. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
redhat-SADPIntel (R): From CVEorg collector
other:Red Hat severity ratingcvssV3_1
  • 2026-02-10T17:02:49.270Z: Reported to Red Hat.
  • 2026-02-10T16:26:00.829Z: Made public.

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/aIntel(R) PlatformsSee referencesunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-1220 · source CWE mapping

Insufficient Granularity of Access Control

Insufficient Granularity of Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-1299 · source CWE mapping

Missing Protection Mechanism for Alternate Hardware Interface

Missing Protection Mechanism for Alternate Hardware Interface represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.