LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-34429: 1Panel CSRF Web Port Configuration Change

1Panel versions 1.10.33 - 2.0.15 contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the web port configuration functionality. The port-change endpoint lacks CSRF defenses such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer validation. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that submits a port-change request; when a victim visits it while authenticated, the browser includes valid session cookies and the request succeeds. This allows an attacker to change the port on which the 1Panel web service listens, causing loss of access on the original port and resulting in service disruption or denial of service, and may unintentionally expose the service on an attacker-chosen port.

HighCVSS 7Not KEV-listedUpdated
Discuss exposureBack to CVEs
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets an attacker trick a logged-in 1Panel administrator’s browser into changing the panel’s web port. The main business impact is disruption: administrators may lose access on the expected port, and the panel could become reachable somewhere unintended.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority management-plane hardening issue. It is not documented as actively exploited, but it can disrupt administrative access and may expose the panel on an unexpected port.

Technical view

CVE-2025-34429 is a CSRF issue in 1Panel web port configuration. The source bundle says versions 1.10.33 through 2.0.15 lack protections such as anti-CSRF tokens or Origin/Referer checks on the port-change endpoint. Impact is integrity change and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to organizations running LXware 1Panel versions identified in the advisory, especially where administrators maintain authenticated browser sessions and the management interface is reachable from user browsing environments.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Abuse requires user interaction: an authenticated administrator must visit attacker-controlled content that causes the browser to submit the configuration change with valid cookies.

Researcher notes

Evidence supports CSRF against the web port configuration function with availability impact. The source bundle does not name a specific patch version, workaround, or exploitation in the wild, so remediation should track vendor guidance closely.

Mitigation direction

  • Check 1Panel vendor releases and advisories for a fixed version before upgrading.
  • Restrict the 1Panel management interface to trusted networks or VPN access.
  • Review and restore the approved 1Panel web listener port configuration.
  • Monitor for unexpected web port changes or administrator access disruption.
  • Reduce risk from persistent authenticated admin browsing sessions.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all 1Panel deployments and record running versions.
  • Confirm whether deployed versions fall within 1.10.33 through 2.0.15.
  • Review configuration history for unexplained web port changes.
  • Check whether administrative access is limited to trusted networks.
  • Assess whether CSRF protections exist on the port configuration workflow.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
5

Public sources used

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-34429 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N——VulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-34429Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LXware1Panel1.10.33unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE-352

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

Open CWE intelligenceSame-CWE CVEs