LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2025-34226: OpenPLC Runtime v3 Persistent DoS

OpenPLC Runtime v3 contains an input validation flaw in the /upload-program-action endpoint: the epoch_time field supplied during program uploads is not validated and can be crafted to induce corruption of the programs database. After a successful malformed upload the runtime continues to operate until a restart; on restart the runtime can fail to start because of corrupted database entries, resulting in persistent denial of service requiring complete rebase of the product to recover. This vulnerability was remediated by commit 095ee09.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

An authenticated user with limited privileges can submit a malformed program upload that corrupts OpenPLC Runtime’s program database. The system may appear healthy until restarted, when it can fail to start and remain unavailable. Recovery may require completely rebuilding the product, creating material operational risk for affected control environments.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority availability issue for operationally important OpenPLC deployments. Prioritize internet-accessible or broadly reachable version 3.0 systems and installations where downtime affects physical processes. Schedule remediation before routine restarts could expose latent corruption, while recognizing that the supplied evidence does not show active exploitation.

Technical view

OpenPLC Runtime 3.0 does not adequately validate the epoch_time field accepted by /upload-program-action. A malformed authenticated upload can corrupt database entries. The runtime continues operating initially, but a later restart can trigger persistent startup failure. CVSS 4.0 rates this 7.1: network-accessible, low complexity, low privileges, no user interaction, high availability impact, and limited integrity impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to OpenPLC Runtime 3.0 according to the supplied record. Risk is greatest where low-privileged accounts can reach the program-upload endpoint over a network. The bundle does not identify affected configurations beyond version 3.0, so organizations should verify deployed builds and access paths rather than assume all installations are vulnerable.

Exploitation context

The vulnerability is not listed as CISA KEV in the supplied bundle, and no cited evidence establishes active exploitation. Exploitation requires low-privileged authenticated access but no user interaction. The disruptive effect is delayed: corruption occurs during upload, while persistent denial of service becomes apparent after restart.

Researcher notes

The core issue is insufficient validation of epoch_time during program upload, mapped to CWE-20 and CWE-664. Commit 095ee09623dd229b64ad3a1db38a901a3772f6fc is identified as the remediation. The bundle does not name a fixed release, provide forensic indicators, or establish exploitation in the wild. Avoid destructive validation against production because triggering may create delayed, persistent failure.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all OpenPLC Runtime 3.0 instances and their program-upload interface exposure.
  • Update to a vendor-supported build containing commit 095ee09; confirm the included release through vendor guidance.
  • Until updated, restrict /upload-program-action to trusted administrators and trusted management networks.
  • Prepare recovery procedures because a corrupted database may require a complete product rebase.

Validation and detection

  • Verify installed versions and confirm the deployed source or package contains commit 095ee09.
  • Review network paths and access controls for /upload-program-action, including accounts permitted to upload programs.
  • Inspect upload and restart records for unexplained failures; the sources provide no reliable exploitation indicators.
  • Test restart and recovery only in an isolated replica to avoid disrupting operational systems.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-664: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2025-34226 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: pocAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:NVulnCheck

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

7.1High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2025-34226Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Autonomy LogicOpenPLC Runtime3.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-664 · source CWE mapping

Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime

Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.